Re: [q-lang-users] Stream constructors

[Keith T. <kaz...@ea...>]

John Cowan wrote:
Since no one is going to actually use them, I suggest going for something verbose like stream-cons and stream-empty. That minimizes conflict with plausible user constructors.

Albert Graef wrote:
Good idea. That'll be stream_cons and stream_nil. Further comments? Anyone upset by this change?
 
The proposed verbose names are fine by me!

Cheers,
Keith