Re: [q-lang-users] Stream constructors

[John C. <co...@cc...>]

Albert Graef scripsit:
> As the new syntactic sugar for streams is now in place (streams now look 
> just like lists, only using curly braces instead of brackets), to clean 
> up the namespace I'd like to rename the stream constructor symbols to 
> `scons' and `snil'.

Since no one is going to actually use them, I suggest going for something
verbose like stream-cons and stream-empty.  That minimizes conflict with
plausible user constructors.

-- 
Income tax, if I may be pardoned for saying so,         John Cowan
is a tax on income.  --Lord Macnaghten (1901)           co...@cc...