Re: [q-lang-users] A proposal to adopt Python tuple syntax

[Tim H. <q...@st...>]

Albert Graef <Dr....@t-...> writes:

> Tim Haynes wrote:
>
> >>Concerning the curly braces, it might be a good idea to keep {...} for
> >>possible future extensions (Haskell-style records come to my mind).
> 
> > You read my mind ... or at least the other mail I just fired-off, partly
> > inspired by this idea.
> 
> No, I read your mind. Really. You know, I do that regularly. ;-)

:)

> > Would the change *require* trailling comma, or just permit it on the
> > grounds of forcing something to be a tuple?
> 
> No, the trailing comma would be entirely optional, except in that one
> ugly special case of the 1-tuple, where it would distinguish (X,) (a
> tuple) from (X) (a parenthesized expression).

Cool. I can cope with that, for sure. 

~Tim
-- 
<http://spodzone.org.uk/>