Re: [q-lang-users] Re: Newbie questions and comments

[Tim H. <q...@st...>]

Albert Graef <Dr....@t-...> writes:

> Yes, Q is a bit slow w.r.t. plain recursion. Well, if I take the
> datapoints at http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ as a reference that
> would mean that Q is within a factor of <2 compared to Python. That's
> consistent with my observations for this type of programs.
> 
> Has anyone tried the Haskell version of the benchmark with Hugs yet? Some
> time ago I did a tak benchmark with both Q and Hugs, and IIRC they were
> pretty much at par.

 | zsh/scr, straw 10:18AM haskell/ % time runhugs takfp.lhs 10
 | 11.0
 | runhugs takfp.lhs 10  407.06s user 0.82s system 99% cpu 6:51.01 total
 | 
 | zsh/scr, straw 10:25AM haskell/ % ~/q-src                  
 | zsh/scr, straw 10:28AM q-src/ % time ./takfp.q 5
 | 10.0
 | ./takfp.q 5  0.09s user 0.00s system 21% cpu 0.412 total
 | 
 | zsh/scr, straw 10:28AM q-src/ % time ./takfp.q 10
 | 11.0
 | ./takfp.q 10  450.37s user 0.64s system 99% cpu 7:33.92 total
 | zsh/scr, straw 10:36AM q-src/ % 

HTH :)

~Tim
-- 
<http://spodzone.org.uk/>