Re: [q-lang-users] Proposal for two minor rearrangements
Brought to you by:
agraef
From: Albert G. <Dr....@t-...> - 2008-01-22 10:11:14
|
Rob Hubbard wrote: > Perhaps there's some argument for the user getting some indication (a > warning?) that Q "fall back" functions are being used. That's not really a viable solution, as having fallback equations to handle special cases of an operation whose core is defined as an external is perfectly legitimate. The only way to make that work would be to have some kind of "not supposed to be extended" markup in extern declarations, which goes against Q's philosophy to allow extensions a.k.a. overloading of any operation, even the builtins. Albert -- Dr. Albert Gr"af Dept. of Music-Informatics, University of Mainz, Germany Email: Dr....@t-..., ag...@mu... WWW: http://www.musikinformatik.uni-mainz.de/ag |