Menu
▾
▴
pyzor-users — general discussion of Pyzor and Pyzor-related topics
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(75) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(46) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(56) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(23) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(28) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(17) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(31) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(9) |
May
(11) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(10) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
(5) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(41) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(21) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(18) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(5) |
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(9) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Tony M. <to...@sp...> - 2010-08-19 04:57:47
|
> http://www.howtoforge.com/the-perfect-spamsnake-ubuntu-jaunty-jackalope-p3 It says there "Because pyzor doesn't work with python2.6 very well, the workaround is to install python2.5 alongside it and use it as the default." That's not true at all. Pyzor works fine with Python 2.6 (and Python 2.7). If you want to use Python 2.5, that's fine too. > However I get stuck when going back from Python2.6 to Python2.5. As soon as > I change to Python2.5 I get the following: [...] > ImportError: No module named pyzor.client You need to install pyzor. If you're running from source, this is done like installing any Python package (run "setup.py install"). If you're not running from source, then it depends what you're using. Cheers, Tony |
|
From: Wesley L. <we...@wl...> - 2010-08-18 19:22:30
|
Hello all, I was following this tutorial: http://www.howtoforge.com/the-perfect-spamsnake-ubuntu-jaunty-jackalope-p3 However I get stuck when going back from Python2.6 to Python2.5. As soon as I change to Python2.5 I get the following: root@SPAMSNAKE:/var/lib# pyzor Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/pyzor", line 7, in <module> import pyzor.client ImportError: No module named pyzor.client The contents of /usr/bin/pyzor is: ----- #!/usr/bin/python import os # set umask os.umask(0077) import pyzor.client pyzor.client.run() ----- Please help me. Thanks! Greets, Wesley |
|
From: Dan M. S. A. <da...@pr...> - 2010-07-09 09:44:46
|
Hey there, I just enabled pyzor as part of spamassassin (freebsd 6.4, pyzor built from ports), and occasionally get this message in my logs: Jul 9 05:40:59 quark spamd[11607]: spamd: connection from prime.gushi.org [72.9.101.130] at port 51280 Jul 9 05:40:59 quark spamd[11607]: spamd: processing message <800...@pd...> for minn:58 Jul 9 05:41:05 quark spamd[11607]: pyzor: [11983] error: TERMINATED, signal 15 (000f) I've got spamd at maximum logging, does anyone offhand know what this error means? -Dan -- --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- |
|
From: Matija N. <mna...@vo...> - 2010-07-05 17:07:01
|
On Sat, Jul 03, 2010 at 06:51:21AM +0300, Oguz Yilmaz wrote: > Is it possble to chain or use in parallel more than one pyzor server? > By pyzord or by amavis? amavis users pyzor, so you can simply edit ~amavis/.pyzor/servers and add serveral servers (one line per server) doing su - amavis pyzor ping will tell you if it's working ok -- Opinions above are GNU-copylefted. |
|
From: Oguz Y. <ogu...@gm...> - 2010-07-03 03:51:31
|
Hi all, Is it possble to chain or use in parallel more than one pyzor server? By pyzord or by amavis? Best Regards, Oguz Yilmaz |
|
From: Barry C. <br...@ea...> - 2010-06-20 11:23:16
|
OK, Doing another spamassassin upgrade on another ,busier server, I am also getting the 'pyzor terminated signal 15' error on every spamd run. I can do ' pyzor ping' and get a quick 200 response from public.pyzor.org. pyzor version 0.4.0 which I know is very old. I am afraid to update as this sendmail server woks very well.The only thing that this causes is not pyzor doing it's things, I guess. Sendmail version 8.13.8, pyzor,0.4.0, kernel 2.6.18, amavisd 2.6.4, spamassassin 3.3.0 Ideas? Barry On Sun, 2010-06-20 at 00:17 -0500, Barry Cisna wrote: > Hello All, > > Just wanted to add another spin to the pyzor > 'error ,terminated signal 15'. > After updating spamassassin- 3.3.0 i seen this error very obvious. > I am using an old( original rpm for Centos 5) 0.4.0 pyzor. > I have noticed( once i set the server directive to ' > public.pyzor.org') , I only get the signal 15 message when sendmail > sends an email to the sys admin user,which contains the > 'localhost.localdomain' in the path name. > Any 'remote/outside' sent emails do not ever see the signal 15 error in > the mail log. > Not sure what to make of that? > > Take Care, > Barry > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > pyzor-users mailing list > pyz...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyzor-users |
|
From: Barry C. <br...@ea...> - 2010-06-20 05:33:15
|
Hello All, Just wanted to add another spin to the pyzor 'error ,terminated signal 15'. After updating spamassassin- 3.3.0 i seen this error very obvious. I am using an old( original rpm for Centos 5) 0.4.0 pyzor. I have noticed( once i set the server directive to ' public.pyzor.org') , I only get the signal 15 message when sendmail sends an email to the sys admin user,which contains the 'localhost.localdomain' in the path name. Any 'remote/outside' sent emails do not ever see the signal 15 error in the mail log. Not sure what to make of that? Take Care, Barry |
|
From: Tony M. <to...@sp...> - 2010-06-03 22:11:58
|
> 0.5 does work with python 2.6 ? Yes, definitely. 2.7 also. > i see depricated calls when trying pyzord A deprecation *warning* is a *warning*. There was a lot of discussion about this on the list last year - read the archives if you are interested in the details. Basically future versions of Pyzor will drop support for older versions of Python in exchange for silencing the deprecation warnings. > since gentoo > upgraded to python 2.6 it does not work anymore, but it will be very > cool to have pyzord back in working state What do you mean doesn't work any more? > PS: will public.pyzor.org be dns round robin ? There's a single server at the moment, so there's no need for that. Cheers, Tony |
|
From: Benny P. <me...@ju...> - 2010-06-03 14:19:16
|
On Thu 03 Jun 2010 12:40:44 AM CEST, Tony Meyer wrote >> i maked a ebuuld for pyzor 0.4.x version on gentoo got pyzord working, later >> 0.5.x version changed to much for me to have it sitll working :( > > The changes from 0.4 to 0.5 were quite minor and nearly all bug fixes, > and nearly all in the client. What changes exactly are preventing you > from using 0.5? 0.5 does work with python 2.6 ? i see depricated calls when trying pyzord >> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216374 > > IIUC the bug you are reporting is just that the documentation for the > accounts file is incorrect. Can you confirm that this is the issue > you are reporting? If so, then I can look into that and make > corrections in the documentation. yes i got 0.4 and python 2.5 working by that above bug, since gentoo upgraded to python 2.6 it does not work anymore, but it will be very cool to have pyzord back in working state next could be a pyzord-proxy that cache from remote if local digest is not known or in sync with whitelist or blacklist count so servers with big loads can use there own local pyzord, i have newer seen timeouts here in 0.4, well another way to solve it is with single point of failurs if thats better ? :=) PS: will public.pyzor.org be dns round robin ? -- xpoint |
|
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2010-06-03 13:50:36
|
Hi Andreas, On 06/03/2010 03:19 PM, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > I only checked pings and reports. Both timeout I indeed get the same problems. It doesn't seem network related. We're going to see why the server is sometimes not responding. Regards, Dreas |
|
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2010-06-03 13:20:05
|
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010, at 11:16, Dreas van Donselaar wrote: > Is it checks that timeout or reports? Or both? I only checked pings and reports. Both timeout. -- -- Andreas |
|
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2010-06-03 09:17:25
|
Hi guys, On 06/02/2010 08:22 PM, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > It seems the transfer of the server to the new provider > so far did not reduce the amount of timeouts. They showed up > from time to time since the transfer and there seems to be an increase > recently (at least since this morning). As always, tested from 2 very > well connected locations (Austria + Germany). > > Something tells me something is wrong :/ > I just have no idea what it is. :( > Is it checks that timeout or reports? Or both? Kind regards, Dreas |
|
From: Tony M. <to...@sp...> - 2010-06-02 22:40:50
|
> i maked a ebuuld for pyzor 0.4.x version on gentoo got pyzord working, later > 0.5.x version changed to much for me to have it sitll working :( The changes from 0.4 to 0.5 were quite minor and nearly all bug fixes, and nearly all in the client. What changes exactly are preventing you from using 0.5? > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216374 IIUC the bug you are reporting is just that the documentation for the accounts file is incorrect. Can you confirm that this is the issue you are reporting? If so, then I can look into that and make corrections in the documentation. Thanks, Tony |
|
From: Tom A. <to...@ar...> - 2010-06-02 20:22:34
|
I am seeing some timeouts. Here is a sample from a couple of hours ago; Wed Jun 2 10:00:00 CDT 2010 Learned from 24 message(s) (24 message(s) examined). public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: Wed Jun 2 12:30:07 CDT 2010 Learned from 14 message(s) (15 message(s) examined). public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 TimeoutError: public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') Ping times to public.pyzor.org are generally pretty good. Coming from a 1.5meg SDSL line in the US; [root@server root]# pyzor ping public.pyzor.org:24441 (200, 'OK') [root@server root]# ping public.pyzor.org PING public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40) from 192.168.0.10 : 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40): icmp_seq=1 ttl=46 time=149 ms 64 bytes from public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40): icmp_seq=2 ttl=46 time=211 ms 64 bytes from public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40): icmp_seq=3 ttl=46 time=140 ms 64 bytes from public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40): icmp_seq=4 ttl=46 time=125 ms --- public.pyzor.org ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% loss, time 3034ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 125.410/156.710/211.353/32.732 ms [root@server root]# traceroute public.pyzor.org traceroute to public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets 1 fw3 (192.168.0.3) 0.577 ms 0.243 ms 0.275 ms 2 dsl001-128-161.dfw1.dsl.speakeasy.net (72.1.128.161) 1.489 ms 1.278 ms 1.174 ms 3 dsl081-117-001.dfw1.dsl.speakeasy.net (64.81.117.1) 10.893 ms 10.031 ms 13.457 ms 4 220.ge-1-0-0.cr2.dfw1.speakeasy.net (69.17.82.237) 7.949 ms 7.787 ms 8.381 ms 5 ge-6-5-440.car2.Dallas1.Level3.net (4.78.224.1) 9.027 ms 8.324 ms 8.147 ms 6 ae-4-90.edge4.Dallas3.Level3.net (4.69.145.205) 8.767 ms 8.076 ms 8.097 ms 7 te2-2-10G.ar5.dal2.gblx.net (64.208.27.9) 9.313 ms 8.669 ms 16.844 ms 8 tengig-1-2-0.bcr1.ams02.nl.reasonnet.com (64.208.17.206) 123.735 ms 124.897 ms 124.245 ms 9 10ge-1-4-115.bb1-ams.reasonnet.com (213.247.40.6) 123.306 ms 123.867 ms 123.984 ms 10 10ge-1-1-919.edge2-ams.reasonnet.com (89.30.133.58) 123.819 ms 124.112 ms 123.839 ms 11 89-18-191-30.pcextreme.nl (89.18.191.30) 124.741 ms 148.641 ms 132.763 ms 12 public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40) 127.611 ms 148.694 ms 131.730 ms --- 82.94.255.100 ping statistics --- 5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% loss, time 4048ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 129.654/132.080/137.294/2.882 ms Andreas Schamanek wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, at 15:42, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > >> What does ping show from both locations? >> > > >From a server in Germany: > > 105 packets transmitted, 105 received, 0% packet loss, time 104414ms > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.779/25.420/168.963/25.277 ms > > >From our Austrian network: > > 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, ... > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.947/38.843/155.793/32.543 ms > > >> traceroute? >> > > 6 vlan70.wien1.aco.net (193.171.23.33) 1.684 ms 0.733 ms 1.004 ms > 7 ge-1-49.bb1.vie.reasonnet.com (193.203.0.142) 0.979 ms 1.678 ms 1.655 ms > 8 ge-2-19-556.bb2-ams.reasonnet.com (89.30.133.245) 19.603 ms 19.600 ms 19.683 ms > 9 10ge-1-4-115.bb1-ams.reasonnet.com (213.247.40.6) 30.726 ms 30.715 ms 31.449 ms > 10 10ge-1-1-919.edge2-ams.reasonnet.com (89.30.133.58) 20.722 ms 20.710 ms 20.212 ms > 11 89-18-191-30.pcextreme.nl (89.18.191.30) 20.183 ms 21.222 ms 21.203 ms > > 4 hetzner-gw.noris.net (213.239.242.254) 22.126 ms 3.557 ms 3.492 ms > 5 ge-1-3-0.de-cix.as25525.net (80.81.192.205) 18.593 ms 13.933 ms 12.344 ms > 6 10ge-1-1-919.edge2-ams.reasonnet.com (89.30.133.58) 11.885 ms 11.860 ms 11.789 ms > 7 89-18-191-30.pcextreme.nl (89.18.191.30) 12.466 ms 12.384 ms 12.244 ms > 8 public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40) [closed] 61.362 ms 12.629 ms 12.498 ms > > >> What sort of command line test(s) did you run aginst the server itself >> > > Basically, I just look at the log for spam reports. This is where I > see the TimeOuts. Then, to verify I just run a bunch of > > $ pyzor ping > > or I feed a spam folder to pyzor report. Don't know if this is of any > any value but here is the core of my bash script which I use to report > if I want some more information (but want to avoid the verbosity > of -d debug): > > #!/bin/bash > # > # Report messages to pyzor > > LOGFILE=~/mypyzorreport.log > echo -n "$(date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S): " >>$LOGFILE # write a timestamp > > MSG=$(cat -) # put message in a variable > LINES=$(echo "$MSG" | formail -I "" | wc -l) # number of lines of body > echo -n "[$LINES] " >>$LOGFILE > echo "$MSG" | pyzor digest >>$LOGFILE > > TIMEFORMAT=%1R # change format of _time_ > OUTPUT=$( { time echo "$MSG" | pyzor -d report ; } 2>&1 ) > > echo $OUTPUT >>$LOGFILE > > sleep 1 > ### EOF > > > HTH, > > -- Tom Armistead to...@ar... 214-233-5167 http://tom.armisteads.com/ ---- Like my email address? Get one like it at http://hover.com/TArmistead |
|
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2010-06-02 19:12:12
|
Hi Marc, On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, at 15:42, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > What does ping show from both locations? >From a server in Germany: 105 packets transmitted, 105 received, 0% packet loss, time 104414ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 11.779/25.420/168.963/25.277 ms >From our Austrian network: 100 packets transmitted, 100 received, 0% packet loss, ... rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 19.947/38.843/155.793/32.543 ms > traceroute? 6 vlan70.wien1.aco.net (193.171.23.33) 1.684 ms 0.733 ms 1.004 ms 7 ge-1-49.bb1.vie.reasonnet.com (193.203.0.142) 0.979 ms 1.678 ms 1.655 ms 8 ge-2-19-556.bb2-ams.reasonnet.com (89.30.133.245) 19.603 ms 19.600 ms 19.683 ms 9 10ge-1-4-115.bb1-ams.reasonnet.com (213.247.40.6) 30.726 ms 30.715 ms 31.449 ms 10 10ge-1-1-919.edge2-ams.reasonnet.com (89.30.133.58) 20.722 ms 20.710 ms 20.212 ms 11 89-18-191-30.pcextreme.nl (89.18.191.30) 20.183 ms 21.222 ms 21.203 ms 4 hetzner-gw.noris.net (213.239.242.254) 22.126 ms 3.557 ms 3.492 ms 5 ge-1-3-0.de-cix.as25525.net (80.81.192.205) 18.593 ms 13.933 ms 12.344 ms 6 10ge-1-1-919.edge2-ams.reasonnet.com (89.30.133.58) 11.885 ms 11.860 ms 11.789 ms 7 89-18-191-30.pcextreme.nl (89.18.191.30) 12.466 ms 12.384 ms 12.244 ms 8 public.pyzor.org (79.99.133.40) [closed] 61.362 ms 12.629 ms 12.498 ms > What sort of command line test(s) did you run aginst the server itself Basically, I just look at the log for spam reports. This is where I see the TimeOuts. Then, to verify I just run a bunch of $ pyzor ping or I feed a spam folder to pyzor report. Don't know if this is of any any value but here is the core of my bash script which I use to report if I want some more information (but want to avoid the verbosity of -d debug): #!/bin/bash # # Report messages to pyzor LOGFILE=~/mypyzorreport.log echo -n "$(date +%Y%m%dT%H%M%S): " >>$LOGFILE # write a timestamp MSG=$(cat -) # put message in a variable LINES=$(echo "$MSG" | formail -I "" | wc -l) # number of lines of body echo -n "[$LINES] " >>$LOGFILE echo "$MSG" | pyzor digest >>$LOGFILE TIMEFORMAT=%1R # change format of _time_ OUTPUT=$( { time echo "$MSG" | pyzor -d report ; } 2>&1 ) echo $OUTPUT >>$LOGFILE sleep 1 ### EOF HTH, -- -- Andreas |
|
From: Marc G. F. <sc...@hu...> - 2010-06-02 18:49:02
|
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > > Hi everyone, > hi Dreas, > > It seems the transfer of the server to the new provider > so far did not reduce the amount of timeouts. They showed up > from time to time since the transfer and there seems to be an increase > recently (at least since this morning). As always, tested from 2 very > well connected locations (Austria + Germany). > > Something tells me something is wrong :/ > I just have no idea what it is. :( What does ping show from both locations? traceroute? What sort of command line test(s) did you run aginst the server itself (ie. something some of us might run from our servers to further test from different locations)? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. sc...@hu... http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:sc...@hu... |
|
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2010-06-02 18:22:49
|
Hi everyone, hi Dreas, It seems the transfer of the server to the new provider so far did not reduce the amount of timeouts. They showed up from time to time since the transfer and there seems to be an increase recently (at least since this morning). As always, tested from 2 very well connected locations (Austria + Germany). Something tells me something is wrong :/ I just have no idea what it is. :( -- -- Andreas |
|
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2010-06-02 07:44:20
|
Hi Benny, It's unclear to me what 0.5.x problems you're running into, based on that bug report. Please report any Pyzor bugs/issues to Trac at http://www.pyzor.org/ Regards, Dreas On 05/22/2010 01:37 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote: > > i maked a ebuuld for pyzor 0.4.x version on gentoo got pyzord working, > later 0.5.x version changed to much for me to have it sitll working :( > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216374 > > could some devs help me make 0.5 work again ? > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > _______________________________________________ > pyzor-users mailing list > pyz...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyzor-users > |
|
From: Marc G. F. <sc...@hu...> - 2010-06-01 14:42:01
|
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Dreas van Donselaar wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 06/01/2010 04:01 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> Is there any work being done to allow distributing the servers ... I could >> offer resources in Panama that would help service central and south >> america, for instance ... > There are currently no plans to distribute the public Pyzor server. Are > you experiencing significant performance issues? The current server > should be responding fast to your Pyzor queries. No issues that I'm aware of ... was more thinking network connectivity then performance ... right now, there is one single point of failure, so if there is a network issue (DDoS, backhoe, etc) that knocks out that facility, its all down ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. sc...@hu... http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:sc...@hu... |
|
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2010-06-01 14:32:10
|
Hi Marc, On 06/01/2010 04:01 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Is there any work being done to allow distributing the servers ... I could > offer resources in Panama that would help service central and south > america, for instance ... There are currently no plans to distribute the public Pyzor server. Are you experiencing significant performance issues? The current server should be responding fast to your Pyzor queries. Kind regards, Dreas |
|
From: Marc G. F. <sc...@hu...> - 2010-06-01 14:19:02
|
Is there any work being done to allow distributing the servers ... I could offer resources in Panama that would help service central and south america, for instance ... On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Dreas van Donselaar wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On 06/01/2010 11:56 AM, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > > Dreas, can you give us some numbers of what the required resources > > are? What's the current rate of checks and reports? I remember a few > > years ago there was approximately a 5 KB/s stream of data. I guess > > this increased quite a bit!? > > It's doing around 2Mbit of traffic. I don't have information about the > rate of checks/reports currently. > > Regards, > > Dreas > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > pyzor-users mailing list > pyz...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pyzor-users > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. sc...@hu... http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:sc...@hu... |
|
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2010-06-01 12:48:04
|
Hi Andreas, On 06/01/2010 11:56 AM, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > Dreas, can you give us some numbers of what the required resources > are? What's the current rate of checks and reports? I remember a few > years ago there was approximately a 5 KB/s stream of data. I guess > this increased quite a bit!? It's doing around 2Mbit of traffic. I don't have information about the rate of checks/reports currently. Regards, Dreas |
|
From: Andreas S. <sch...@fa...> - 2010-06-01 09:56:55
|
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, at 11:23, Dreas van Donselaar wrote to pyzor-announce: > To further increase the reliability of the public server, it has been > moved to the infrastructure of PCextreme (http://www.pcextreme.nl/) > who has been so kind to sponsor the required resources. Thanks a lot to everyone involved. Dreas, can you give us some numbers of what the required resources are? What's the current rate of checks and reports? I remember a few years ago there was approximately a 5 KB/s stream of data. I guess this increased quite a bit!? -- -- Andreas |
|
From: Benny P. <me...@ju...> - 2010-05-21 23:37:50
|
i maked a ebuuld for pyzor 0.4.x version on gentoo got pyzord working, later 0.5.x version changed to much for me to have it sitll working :( http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216374 could some devs help me make 0.5 work again ? -- xpoint |
|
From: Dreas v. D. <dr...@sp...> - 2010-05-18 11:18:01
|
Hi, On 05/18/2010 12:14 PM, Andreas Schamanek wrote: > Does anyone know what's going on? I can't reach public.pyzor.org from > my locations. > This was an issue on the Pyzor server. Apologies for the inconvenience. We're investigating why this was unnoticed and what caused it. Regards, Dreas |
9 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
