From: Luis D. L. Q. <lui...@gm...> - 2009-07-16 14:54:35
|
Le jeudi 16 juillet 2009 04:00:15, Andreas Schamanek a écrit : > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, at 20:43, Tony Meyer wrote: > > Is there anything about the existing public.pyzor.org that makes it > > unsuitable for use? i.e. is there anything that could be improved > > that would mean that you didn't see the need to have your own mirror? > > My answer is no. Indeed, no matter what I think about it it's no > because until today I managed to run my mail servers without a local > pyzor server (though I did think about installing one quite often ;) > during Pyzor's more troubled times of past years). > > Nevertheless, we do see occasional timeouts which I think a > disrupting the whole idea of Pyzor: > > $ grep -ci "reporting to pyzor services" $LOGSPAMJULY > 2409 > $ grep -ci "^public.pyzor.org:24441.*TimeoutError" $LOGSPAMJULY > 226 > > That's a 9 % rate in July. > Is it just me here in Vienna, Austria? Having another mirror wouldnt reduce that 9% to 4.5% because DNS RR? |