From: Robert H. L. <la...@la...> - 2009-07-16 09:51:30
|
Andreas Schamanek wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, at 20:43, Tony Meyer wrote: > >> Is there anything about the existing public.pyzor.org that makes it >> unsuitable for use? i.e. is there anything that could be improved >> that would mean that you didn't see the need to have your own mirror? > > My answer is no. Indeed, no matter what I think about it it's no > because until today I managed to run my mail servers without a local > pyzor server (though I did think about installing one quite often ;) > during Pyzor's more troubled times of past years). > > Nevertheless, we do see occasional timeouts which I think a > disrupting the whole idea of Pyzor: > > $ grep -ci "reporting to pyzor services" $LOGSPAMJULY > 2409 > $ grep -ci "^public.pyzor.org:24441.*TimeoutError" $LOGSPAMJULY > 226 > > That's a 9 % rate in July. > Is it just me here in Vienna, Austria? > No, I have seen it give timeouts up to a day at a time. I don't really complain, as my mail server supports just me and two other people. -- END OF LINE --MCP |