From: Tom <mai...@ii...> - 2009-06-26 22:44:24
|
Hi Tony, First thank you for your detailed explanations. > We could use the sample message provided by SA > (http://spamassassin.apache.org/gtube/gtube.txt) as the 'high hit > count' example - that would somewhat address both concerns (and in > fact it is the case now, since there have been 151 reports of the > sample message). Any other message containing the GTUBE string > wouldn't (necessarily) have a high hit count, but the example message > would. OTOH, maybe that would just be confusing, as here. Just pinging the service (pyzor ping) doesn't really mean it's well configured in spamassassin and amavis and that it will score SPAM. Maybe because I'm Thomas, I only believe what I see :) So I will open a ticket in TRAC to ask this "pong" feature which will allow us (pessimists and newbies) to test/see if pyzor is correctly enabled in the whole chain. I agree, pyzor worked well out of the box and it was mainly a Pebkac error [1] than a pyzor issue. Now with your explanations I have a far better understanding than before. Thanks. Thomas. [1] : Problem exists between keyboard and chair |