From: Tony M. <to...@sp...> - 2009-04-29 20:50:22
|
> I meant who is working on a new version of Pyzor? At the moment, I am, and I believe that's basically it. More help is (of course) always welcome. I have a new release basically ready to go - it's just bug fixes (the majority contributed back from the Debian pyzor package, so well tested). I attempted to resolve all the outstanding bug reports and patch submissions - work on feature requests can start after this one goes out. I believe all the changes are on the client side. In addition, I've also been working on the server code. The existing code was struggling to keep up with requests, even with modern hardware. I've modified the server code so that it's reasonably easy to add support for different database backends - the existing gdbm database should still work, and I've got an example MySQL implementation (postgreSQL, sqlite, ZODB, etc, should be simple to add, if anyone had use for that). I think an announcement post may come soon covering this, but as of a couple of days ago, this new server code is live. However, it's not yet checked into SVN - I'd like this upcoming release to be totally bugfixes, so will check in the changes as soon as I manage to get the release done. I'm pretty sure that nearly all pyzor users are only interested in the client code (and using the public server), so there doesn't seem to be too much of a hurry. > Is there any testing I can help with, > or I could possibly run a test peering server in our offices if that helps. Thanks. I think as far as the server goes, it's easy enough for me to test here (on a dev server first, and then live). Testing the client would certainly be useful, particularly as we start moving into adding new features. Feel free to comment on any of the feature tickets (on sourceforge: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=50000&atid=458245), too, if you want to weigh in on what you think would be worth adding/changing. Cheers, Tony |