From: Duane V. <du...@io...> - 2004-11-13 20:02:24
|
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 11:36:28AM -0800, Kelson wrote: > Mark Nienberg wrote: > > I think the reason there is very little activity on the > > list is that the code is mature and works very well for > > most users. can't think of anything that would be needed > > to improve it. > > Better error handling, perhaps? > > There are still certain input errors (bad values for > Content-Transfer-Encoding, for instance) that cause Pyzor to crash and > spit out 25 lines of Python exception info instead of simply remark > "invalid header" and continue on its way. This is especially > frustrating when reporting an mbox file. I think Mark is right. Furthermore, I don't think many users actively submit spam so they don't see the (still?) frequent mime attachment errors issued by the python (not pyzor) mail parsing code. My memory of all this has definitely faded since my mailbox has been delightfully clean for quite a while now. :) Duane |