From: Jan-Peter K. <Jan...@se...> - 2004-11-10 06:19:13
|
On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 9:21 PM Lars Holmstr=F6m wrote:=20 > I really do not support the numbers you are giving. I think you missed my point. :-) > I run two mailservers. One of them currently accept 400-600 mail per > day and pyzor is a very usable tool that help the users to sort out > about 80-120 mails per day. =20 I am not saying Pyzor is not a useful tool. Together with SpamAssassin = it is extremely valuable even for low traffic mailservers. All I am = saying is, if you run you own Pyzor server that is _not_ connected to = the public server(s), it will be of no use to you if you are having low = traffic. In order for Pyzor/Razor/DCC to identify a message some other = user/system must have already seen this particular message and reported = it to Pyzor/Razor/DCC. Only then will your system benefit. So if you run = your own server with just a few tousand messages, it will surely filter = some spam but the first one will make it through Pyzor. Suggestion: If you run a low-traffic mailserver, use the public = Razor/DCC/Pyzor servers. If your system is really high-traffic, then run = your own server if possible but sync your checkums with the public = servers. I am not sure if/how this works with Pyzor, but there should be = some way... Regards, JP |