Re: Pyzor project status?

[Paul B. <pau...@gm...>]

On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 10:35:27 -0700, Mark Nienberg <ma...@ti...> wro=
te:
> On 5 Oct 2004 at 9:42, Paul Bissex wrote:
> > But activity seems very low, and as somebody noted in September (I
> > looked at the archives), this includes reporting activity, which in
> > turn makes it a lot less useful.
>=20
> I think activity on the mailing list is low because pyzor is a fairly mat=
ure product that
> works well.  It is easy to set up, and it doesn't seem to need much devel=
opment.

Cool, thanks. That makes sense. (Thanks to Tim for his offlist reply too).=
=20

If anybody out there is running Pyzor with Postfix (not as part of SA,
but standalone), I'd be interested in seeing configuration details.=20
I'll hit the Postfix list if I don't hear anything here.

thanks

pb

--=20
paul bissex, e-scribe.com -- database-driven web development
413.585.8095
69.55.225.29
01061-0847
72=B039'71"W 42=B019'42"N