Re: Pyzor project status?

[Mark N. <ma...@ti...>]

On 5 Oct 2004 at 9:42, Paul Bissex wrote:
> But activity seems very low, and as somebody noted in September (I
> looked at the archives), this includes reporting activity, which in
> turn makes it a lot less useful.

I think activity on the mailing list is low because pyzor is a fairly mature product that 
works well.  It is easy to set up, and it doesn't seem to need much development.

I use MailScanner for virus and spam control on our company mail server.  
MailScanner can use of SpamAssassin for improved spam checking.  
SpamAssassin can use Pyzor and other programs as plug-ins to improve its 
accuracy.  I use DCC as well as Pyzor with our SpamAssassin.  The logs of my mail 
server verify that Pyzor is triggered on many spam messages, so I think the reporting 
is sufficient. 
-- 
Mark W. Nienberg, SE
Tipping Mar + associates
1906 Shattuck Ave
Berkeley, CA 94704
510 549-1906 ext 236
http://www.tippingmar.com