From: Paul B. <pau...@gm...> - 2004-10-05 13:43:39
|
Hi all, I feel like I'm a little late to the party, but regardless I just started checking out Pyzor. For various reasons I am leaning toward it over Razor and DCC. If it ends up seeming worthwhile I'd like to add it to my Postfix anti-spam setup, loosely documented here: http://e-scribe.com/antispam/ But activity seems very low, and as somebody noted in September (I looked at the archives), this includes reporting activity, which in turn makes it a lot less useful. At the moment I've got a spamtrap account with procmail running "pyzor report" on each incoming message (hence all the one-counts below): formail -s pyzor check < ~spamtrap/mbox 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 81 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 17409 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 17409 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 589 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 556 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 626 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 217.160.253.84:24441 (200, 'OK') 1 0 So anyway, before I launch into my specific questions I thought I'd ping the list and make sure this is worth pursuing. Anybody out there? Regards pb --=20 paul bissex, e-scribe.com -- database-driven web development 413.585.8095 69.55.225.29 01061-0847 72=B039'71"W 42=B019'42"N |