RE: Digesting and Spam-matching

[Roman S. <rn...@on...>]

On Fri, 2 May 2003, Keith Jackson wrote:

I am not sure bayes-formula based filter are of any good
when catching server-wide spam. Last month volume of spam
increased again and now I see more and more spams 
which use randomization. They put random strings 
right into text! Human can distinguish "random"
pieces easily while computers can't. 

Personally I am using SpamOracle and it chokes on 
<!--dfsdfsdf--> based technique.

So, it seems, spammers will be major inspiration for AI people ;-)

In my view, any mail/spam left after pyzor is to be read
by some AI system. Bayes is only first step to that.

And also I do not think pyzor need to be more adaptive.
It's simple and bullet-proof tool. And not hi-profile one - 
so spammers are not taking it into account yet ;-)


Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi
-- 
rn...@on... =\= My AI powered by GNU/Linux RedHat 7.3