From: André W. <wo...@us...> - 2012-05-21 21:04:45
|
Hi, Am 14.05.2012 um 11:05 schrieb Michael J Gruber: > This becomes quite visible when you're trying to position arrow heads at > various intermediate positions, but also when you try to line up arrow > heads with other decorations (such as text) which are *really* > positioned at pos*arclen (or relarclenpos*arclen, there's no consistent > naming). I just wonder about this one. I didn't check myself, but it might be an error of the text decorator. Shouldn't it take into account "<arclen-of-the-path> - <length-of-the-text>" for positioning? Well, it might be, it might not. But the arrow does take into account "<arclen-of-the-path> - <constriction-length>". This is correct IMHO. Best, André -- by _ _ _ Dr. André Wobst, Amselweg 22, 85716 Unterschleißheim / \ \ / ) wo...@us..., http://www.wobsta.de/ / _ \ \/\/ / PyX - High quality PostScript and PDF figures (_/ \_)_/\_/ with Python & TeX: visit http://pyx.sourceforge.net/ |