|
From: Michael J G. <mic...@us...> - 2011-05-17 06:56:27
|
Joerg Lehmann venit, vidit, dixit 16.05.2011 23:09: > Hi Michael, > > On 16.05.11, Michael J Gruber wrote: >> Congrats on the release! Alas, the tag is botched: > > I have redone the tag in the correct way. > > Cheers, Thanks, perfect! I pushed that as git-tag pyx_0_11 and the old one as pyx_0_11@3129 to keep the promise that all svn tags are represented as git tag objects, i.e. all svn revisions are either git commits or git tag objects (I keep the tag creating commits locally but don't push them; they are 1-commit side branches with empty diff). So, for example the following works nicely now: http://repo.or.cz/w/PyX.git/commitdiff/tags/pyx_0_11?hp=tags/pyx_0_10 Compare that to: http://repo.or.cz/w/PyX.git/commitdiff/tags/pyx_0_11@3129?hp=tags/pyx_0_10 That's a real stress test for git's rename detection :-) Cheers, Michael |