|
From: Andre W. <wo...@us...> - 2005-10-11 11:29:44
|
Hi, On 11.10.05, Michael Schindler wrote: > I just tried to create an axis with graph.axis.linked, thinking of the > similar notation graph.axis.linear > > But the linked axis wants to be called graph.axis.linkedaxis > > This is quite redundant. What about renaming some axes: > > axis.linkedaxis -> axis.linked > axis.anchored -> axis.anchored > axis.anchoredpathaxis -> axis.anchoredpath > axis.pathaxis -> axis.path In principle, I do not have any problem with this. You should only be aware of the point, that in earlier version there was some very strange axis.linked, which was basically something like axis.regular, but not calculating axis partitions ... and there there other linked axis like linkedbar and linkedsplit. All those are gone now. Instead, we have an anchoredaxis (an axis with position and data storage) and an linkedaxis (an axis with a position, but not a private data storage). Overall, this is quite clean now, but we have some strange namings ... right. So I don't have any problems with changing back the names ... I'm sorry for the confusion. It just was very important to clean up the system ... André -- by _ _ _ Dr. André Wobst / \ \ / ) wo...@us..., http://www.wobsta.de/ / _ \ \/\/ / PyX - High quality PostScript and PDF figures (_/ \_)_/\_/ with Python & TeX: visit http://pyx.sourceforge.net/ |