|
From: Joerg L. <jo...@us...> - 2004-08-31 06:39:13
|
Hi,
On 31.08.04, Andre Wobst wrote:
> On 30.08.04, Jörg Lehmann wrote:
> > apply deformers when drawing a path. Note that it is not clear
> > whether we first apply a trafo and then a deformer or vice versa
>
> One could argue, that a transformation is not that different from a
> deformer ...
>
> I do not yet claim, that we should do so, but we might at least
> discuss this point of view. It would automatically lead to a solution
> to this problem ...
Good point. I actually like this idea. We just have to derive
trafo.trafo from deformer.deformer and supply trafo.trafo with a
deform method.
Jörg
|