pywrapper-users Mailing List for pywrapper (Page 2)
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
jatorre
You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(18) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(15) |
Dec
(30) |
2009 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(73) |
Jun
(76) |
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(38) |
Apr
(47) |
May
(89) |
Jun
(63) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(56) |
Sep
(23) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Renato De G. <re...@ig...> - 2008-07-25 12:29:04
|
Testing |
From: Mohr <Flemming-|<ra...@gi...> - 2008-07-25 11:51:18
|
Do you see a girl or an old woman in this picture. http://www.sumacyl.com/watchit.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
From: Adewale <kki...@pr...> - 2008-07-24 21:27:42
|
Senator John Mccain Wishes To Have Sex With Model Heidi Klum; Others http://eltoldomaselegantedelmundo.com/watchit.html |
From: Breker <Bou...@nu...> - 2008-07-22 20:49:16
|
Hillary admitted to Bill being on herbal supplements to help enhance performance http://www.casebucks.com/ -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
From: Pawel <re-...@4s...> - 2008-07-22 04:52:48
|
Bush 'Troubled' by Gay Marriages. Declares San Francisco Part of 'Axis of Evil' http://www.wortmannweb.de/viewmovie.html |
From: Wucherpfennig <oil...@pi...> - 2008-07-21 19:42:43
|
Gay Men Perceive Each Other As Homophobic http://thewindsorhotel.it/viewmovie.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
From: Gabe <Gab...@in...> - 2008-07-19 12:52:41
|
The evil secret about iPhones, discover it here. http://www.ristorante-remise.de/hot.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
From: Sengorn <sl...@th...> - 2008-07-18 20:45:39
|
Read our guide and achieve ultimate happiness for next to nothing. http://heraldry.mol.com.mk/news.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
From: Shayna <ind...@dy...> - 2008-07-18 14:44:48
|
All the dirty secrets about American Idol, you win by getting there with favors. http://farmaciaadanero.es/news.html |
From: halidada <dno...@ji...> - 2008-07-18 13:28:04
|
All the dirty secrets about American Idol, you win by getting there with favors. http://hotelcanada.com.br/news.html |
From: Laing <ecy...@4m...> - 2008-07-17 02:22:36
|
New York Knicks team killed in bus accident http://www2.shs-imst.tsn.at/about.html -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
From: Croes <lav...@sp...> - 2008-07-16 23:04:22
|
Iran launches missiles toward Europe prompting worldwide panic http://id-service.fr/about.html |
From: R. <Eri...@ga...> - 2008-07-08 12:18:56
|
Britney seen on the arms of Patriots star Tom Brady http://www.moeterssc.de/r.html |
From: ljungstrand <Ger...@AD...> - 2008-07-03 11:47:45
|
Major gains in length and girth are now possible, fully assured http://www.pickfriend.com/ -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
From: Feig <bax...@RJ...> - 2008-06-22 14:36:09
|
Give your lady godly action in bed with your new pecker http://www.satymewe.com/ -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
From: L. <kli...@IT...> - 2008-06-19 19:55:19
|
Ex-Pentagon lawyers challenged on sex abuse in Iraq http://textartmagazin.eomis.de/r.html |
From: T. <Ton...@GE...> - 2008-06-19 14:12:38
|
Get the latest herbal enhancements to grow your large howitzer now http://wandea1.wandea.org.pl/r.html |
From: Ashwin <rec...@HO...> - 2008-06-11 07:57:32
|
Your love tool will be massive after this http://www.nivateers.com/ |
From: Kaori F. <yur...@ya...> - 2007-10-12 11:03:28
|
セフレ探しのセレブな奥様達が集まる無料掲示板 今月から無料掲示板がパワーアップ、セフレ探しをするセレブな奥様達だけが集まり、女性だけで運営している掲示板がオープン♪男性の皆様に有意義な時間を過ごしてもらい、セフレの輪を広げていこうと考えています。(料金は全て女性負担となります。) 今や、他人には言えない、うしろめたい...などといったことはありません。 堂々とセレブなセフレ探しを楽しみましょう。そのひとりから、次の人へ、そのまた次へ... それでは宜しくお願い致します。 http://marriage-news.net/?e77 尚、当掲示板では業者対策として本人確認出来ていない女性は※印、本人確認が出来ている女性には☆印が付いておりますので安心してご利用下さい。 興味ない方はお手数ですがこちらまでお願いします。 inf...@ya... |
From: <m.d...@BG...> - 2006-07-31 09:38:38
|
We have created a user called "pywrapper" as a substitute for an = anonymous user (which had to be blocked because of spamming).=20 Please login as user pywrapper to submit new tickets: user=3Dpywrapper=20 password=3Dpywrapper This user does not have any rights on the SVN repository. Markus >>> From: pyw...@li... >> on behalf of >>> Javier privat >>> Sent: Sat 7/29/2006 12:38 PM >>> To: PyWrapper Developers mailing list >>> Cc:=09 >>> Subject: [PyWrapper-devel] Close create tickets for >> anonymous users >>> in trac >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I had to remove the permission for anonymous users to create new=20 >>> tickets on the Trac system. We started receiving spam last >> week and I >>> suppose that once discovered things can only get worst. >>> >>> I haven't seen any ticket submission from anybody apart of >> Markus and >>> me, but I would like to ask people who is starting to try PyWrapper=20 >>> to contact us and we can create them an account to submit bugs and=20 >>> feature request to the system. >>> >>> Unfortunately it is not possible to self-register. >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> Javi. >>> |
From: <jc...@in...> - 2006-06-09 15:36:49
|
Hi Renato, Thanks for the reply. I solved the problem. The problem was indeed in = the definition of my view file. I just defined on more level under the root element. My view was like this: /ViewSpecies/ViewName /ViewSpecies/ViewKingdom /ViewSpecies/ViewHabitat I added one more level /Dataset/ and everything worked fine. /Dataset/ViewSpecies/ViewName /Dataset/ViewSpecies/ViewKingdom /Dataset/ViewSpecies/ViewHabitat Thanks for the information, Jose Cuadra -----Original Message----- From: Renato De Giovanni [mailto:re...@cr...]=20 Sent: Friday, June 09, 2006 5:24 AM To: pyw...@li... Cc: Jose Cuadra Subject: Re: [PyWrapper-users] Question regarding results Hi Jose, It's difficult to tell what's going on without looking at the view=20 definition and also without knowing about the underlying database=20 mapping. But I would guess that your definition of element=20 <ViewSpecies> probably lacks an attribute: maxOccurs=3D"unbounded". Hope this helps, -- Renato On 7 Jun 2006 at 19:41, Jose Cuadra wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > Currently I installed and ran some queries on the pywrapper. > I managed to install the pywrapper and did all the configuring to map=20 > it to a little test-database I created. >=20 > My question, for the moment is that when the pywrapper returns me the=20 > results, they come in this format: >=20 > <search> > <ViewSpecies> > <ViewName>Aspasia principissa</ViewName>=20 > <ViewName>Balantiopteryx plicata</ViewName>=20 > <ViewName>Caluromys derbianus</ViewName>=20 > <ViewKingdom>Plantae</ViewKingdom> > <ViewKingdom>Animalia</ViewKingdom> > <ViewKingdom>Animalia</ViewKingdom> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques muy humedos.</ViewHabitat>=20 > <ViewHabitat>Bosques secos, bosques de=20 > galeria.</ViewHabitat>=20 > <ViewHabitat>Bosques humedos, secos</ViewHabitat>=20 > </ViewSpecies> > <summary start=3D"0" totalMatched=3D"7"next=3D"5" />=20 > </search> >=20 >=20 > I was reading the Tapir Wiki (the examples) and I saw that the data=20 > should not be returned that way, instead it should be returned=20 > following the clear separation between related elements, something=20 > like this maybe: >=20 > <search> > <ViewSpecies> > <ViewName>Aspasia principissa</ViewName>=20 > <ViewKingdom>Plantae</ViewKingdom> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques muy humedos.</ViewHabitat> > </ViewSpecies> > <ViewSpecies> > <ViewName>Balantiopteryx plicata</ViewName>=20 > <ViewKingdom>Animalia</ViewKingdom> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques secos, bosques de galeria.</ViewHabitat> > </ViewSpecies> > <ViewSpecies> > <ViewName>Caluromys derbianus</ViewName> =20 > <ViewKingdom>Animalia</ViewKingdom>=20 > <ViewHabitat>Bosques humedos, secos</ViewHabitat>=20 > </ViewSpecies> > <summary start=3D"0" totalMatched=3D"7"next=3D"5" />=20 > </search> >=20 > I=B4ve had more experience with the DiGIR requests/responses syntax,=20 > and this is why I am asking this question. > I would really appreciate if you could clarify to me if this is a=20 > pywrapper issue, a protocol issue, or an issue with any configuration=20 > I did badly on my side, like for example a bad-defined view. >=20 > Thanks for the help, > Jose Cuadra |
From: Renato De G. <re...@cr...> - 2006-06-09 11:24:39
|
Hi Jose, It's difficult to tell what's going on without looking at the view definition and also without knowing about the underlying database mapping. But I would guess that your definition of element <ViewSpecies> probably lacks an attribute: maxOccurs=3D"unbounded". Hope this helps, -- Renato On 7 Jun 2006 at 19:41, Jose Cuadra wrote: > > Hello, > > Currently I installed and ran some queries on the pywrapper. > I managed to install the pywrapper and did all the configuring to map > it to a little test-database I created. > > My question, for the moment is that when the pywrapper returns me the > results, they come in this format: > > <search> > <ViewSpecies> > <ViewName>Aspasia principissa</ViewName> > <ViewName>Balantiopteryx plicata</ViewName> > <ViewName>Caluromys derbianus</ViewName> > <ViewKingdom>Plantae</ViewKingdom> > <ViewKingdom>Animalia</ViewKingdom> > <ViewKingdom>Animalia</ViewKingdom> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques muy humedos.</ViewHabitat> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques secos, bosques de > galeria.</ViewHabitat> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques humedos, secos</ViewHabitat> > </ViewSpecies> > <summary start=3D"0" totalMatched=3D"7"next=3D"5" /> > </search> > > > I was reading the Tapir Wiki (the examples) and I saw that the data > should not be returned that way, instead it should be returned > following the clear separation between related elements, something > like this maybe: > > <search> > <ViewSpecies> > <ViewName>Aspasia principissa</ViewName> > <ViewKingdom>Plantae</ViewKingdom> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques muy humedos.</ViewHabitat> > </ViewSpecies> > <ViewSpecies> > <ViewName>Balantiopteryx plicata</ViewName> > <ViewKingdom>Animalia</ViewKingdom> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques secos, bosques de galeria.</ViewHabitat> > </ViewSpecies> > <ViewSpecies> > <ViewName>Caluromys derbianus</ViewName> > <ViewKingdom>Animalia</ViewKingdom> > <ViewHabitat>Bosques humedos, secos</ViewHabitat> > </ViewSpecies> > <summary start=3D"0" totalMatched=3D"7"next=3D"5" /> > </search> > > I=B4ve had more experience with the DiGIR requests/responses syntax, > and this is why I am asking this question. > I would really appreciate if you could clarify to me if this is a > pywrapper issue, a protocol issue, or an issue with any configuration > I did badly on my side, like for example a bad-defined view. > > Thanks for the help, > Jose Cuadra |
From: <jc...@in...> - 2006-06-09 00:51:53
|
Hi Markus, Thanks for the reply. Currently I am getting to know TAPIR and I've been studying a bit the protocol (the one at http://ww2.biocase.org/svn/tapir/trunk/protocol/tapir.xsd) because I am really interested in knowing about the details of this new protocol, = along with all its capabilities. I am currently working at the National Biodiversity Institute in Costa Rica (INBio) and one of the main goals = at the moment is to install the pywrapper as a provider, so this explains = my interest in the protocol. It's glad to hear that soon there would be a new release of the = pywrapper (the 20th of august). We already managed to install the pywrapper tool = with a little test-database we defined, so we are slowly getting familiar = with the format (search request/search response/inventories/etc). We are also looking forward for the release of the ConfigTool, that I hope will ease = up the configuration process :) In the meantime, we will be really interested if you have the version of TAPIR (the draft from 2005) that is currently supported by the = pywrapperV2 (just for the sake of getting to know TAPIR better). Later, when the pywrapper and TAPIR get refined, we will be in better ground for = studying the changes. Thanks a lot, Jose Cuadra -----Original Message----- From: pyw...@li... [mailto:pyw...@li...] On Behalf Of = "D=F6ring, Markus" Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2006 6:19 PM To: PyWrapper users mailing list Subject: Re: [PyWrapper-users] Pywrapper2 and TAPIR Hi Jose, the current pywrapper "release" is based on a TAPIR draft from 2005. I = am currently updating the code and the fully TAPIR compliant version will = be available by 20th of august. maybe even earlier but thats not guaranteed. if you are interested in pre-versions please let me know. thanks, markus -----Original Message----- From: pyw...@li... on behalf of Jose Cuadra Sent: Thu 6/8/2006 8:10 PM To: pyw...@li... Cc:=09 Subject: [PyWrapper-users] Pywrapper2 and TAPIR Hello, =20 I've been analyzing the format of some of the requests/responses = regarding the pywrapper2, and I've seen some differences between the format that = the latest TAPIR protocol states (at http://ww2.biocase.org/svn/tapir/trunk/protocol/tapir.xsd), and the = format the pywrapper is returning. Among these things, for example, the = pywrapper still uses the <view> element on the requests, contrary to the <outputModel> element the protocol states. =20 I will like to know which version of the protocol does the pywrapper2 currently supports and if this version is still available on the web? = Any other useful information about the relation between pywrapper/TAPIR = would be appreciated. =20 Thanks, Jose Cuadra _______________________________________________ Pywrapper-users mailing list Pyw...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pywrapper-users |
From: <m.d...@BG...> - 2006-06-09 00:19:51
|
Hi Jose, the current pywrapper "release" is based on a TAPIR draft from 2005. I = am currently updating the code and the fully TAPIR compliant version = will be available by 20th of august. maybe even earlier but thats not guaranteed. if you are interested in pre-versions please let me know. thanks, markus -----Original Message----- From: pyw...@li... on behalf of Jose = Cuadra Sent: Thu 6/8/2006 8:10 PM To: pyw...@li... Cc:=09 Subject: [PyWrapper-users] Pywrapper2 and TAPIR Hello, =20 I've been analyzing the format of some of the requests/responses = regarding the pywrapper2, and I've seen some differences between the format that = the latest TAPIR protocol states (at http://ww2.biocase.org/svn/tapir/trunk/protocol/tapir.xsd), and the = format the pywrapper is returning. Among these things, for example, the = pywrapper still uses the <view> element on the requests, contrary to the <outputModel> element the protocol states. =20 I will like to know which version of the protocol does the pywrapper2 currently supports and if this version is still available on the web? = Any other useful information about the relation between pywrapper/TAPIR = would be appreciated. =20 Thanks, Jose Cuadra |
From: <jc...@in...> - 2006-06-08 18:06:43
|
Hello, I've been analyzing the format of some of the requests/responses regarding the pywrapper2, and I've seen some differences between the format that the latest TAPIR protocol states (at http://ww2.biocase.org/svn/tapir/trunk/protocol/tapir.xsd), and the format the pywrapper is returning. Among these things, for example, the pywrapper still uses the <view> element on the requests, contrary to the <outputModel> element the protocol states. I will like to know which version of the protocol does the pywrapper2 currently supports and if this version is still available on the web? Any other useful information about the relation between pywrapper/TAPIR would be appreciated. Thanks, Jose Cuadra |