Re: [PyWrapper-devel] MOBY service

[Javier de la T. <ja...@gm...>]

Hi Milko,

I think we can start discussing on the mailing list and then add  
tickets when we consider.

Javi.

On 19/11/2006, at 22:55, Skofic A. Milko (IPGRI) wrote:

> No problem, I have no problem in sharing views, do you prefer an e- 
> mail discussion or a series of tickets?
>
> On Nov 19, 2006, at 20:23 , Javier de la Torre wrote:
>
>> Hi Milko,
>>
>>> Once we have released TAPIR can we have a skype or talk to see  
>>> what we can do in the future? What are the plans for the future,  
>>> Could we make a wish list and plan how we can implement it?
>>>
>>
>> I prefer if you express your wishes here on the public list so  
>> that people knows what is going on. Maybe your wishes are the same  
>> as others and there is someone already planning it.
>>
>> After expressing the wishes here on the list then we can add the  
>> to the trac where there is already 10 or more wishes of things we  
>> would like to see in pywrapper.
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> JAvi.
>>
>>> Bye!
>>>
>>> Milko
>>>
>>> On Nov 17, 2006, at 13:53 , Javier de la Torre wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Milko,
>>>>
>>>> I have to watch out the refresh issue in moby. Adding the  
>>>> possibility to choose a moby central should not be complicate  
>>>> with an important consideration. Should we allow users to have  
>>>> services registered in different MOBY registries? If so, the  
>>>> configuration files must be changed to use as a service  
>>>> identifier the serviceName, authURI and THE REGISTRY were it was  
>>>> registered. This is important to know from where to register and  
>>>> deregister the services.
>>>>
>>>> If a pywrapper installation can work only with one single MOBY  
>>>> registry then it is easier, I can just add an input field in the  
>>>> configtool to allow users to write the endpoint of the registry  
>>>> they wanna use.
>>>>
>>>> I believe that the correct solution is to be "multiple  
>>>> registries aware" in pywrapper, but this will take a little bit  
>>>> more of time, meanwhile this weekend I can add you the simple  
>>>> solution...
>>>>
>>>> Cheers.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 17/11/2006, at 13:44, Skofic A. Milko (IPGRI) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Javier, I finally made my first MOBy service,  
>>>>> getTaxaOfBoundingBox, if you are interested in adding it to the  
>>>>> examples I send you the files, remember to change the links in  
>>>>> the files, they point to the eurisco site.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a problem when you register a new MOBY service: TAPIR  
>>>>> takes a while before recognising that the service is up and  
>>>>> running; when testing one must manually delete the cache files  
>>>>> to test it with Dashboard.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you think we can get a way to set the MOBY central?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ciao!
>>>>>
>>>>> Milko
>>>>>
>>>>> <getTaxaOfBoundingBox.bmtts.xml>
>>>>> This is the BMTTS section.
>>>>>
>>>>> <getTaxaOfBoundingBox.bmtts.xml>
>>>>> This is the output model.
>>>>>
>>>>> <BoundingBox.xslt>
>>>>> This is the input transformation stylesheet.
>>>>>
>>>>> <TaxonScientificName.xsd>
>>>>> This is the schema for the MOBY taxon name.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Milko A. Skofic (IPGRI)
>>> International Plant Genetic Resources Institute
>>> Via dei Tre Denari, 472/a
>>> 00057 Maccarese (RM)
>>> ITALY
>>> E-mail: m.s...@cg...
>>> Tel: +30 06 6118286
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> Milko A. Skofic (IPGRI)
> International Plant Genetic Resources Institute
> Via dei Tre Denari, 472/a
> 00057 Maccarese (RM)
> ITALY
> E-mail: m.s...@cg...
> Tel: +30 06 6118286
>
>