Re: [PyWrapper-devel] Libraries distribution in PyWrapper
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
jatorre
From: Javier de la T. <ja...@gm...> - 2006-08-02 19:56:35
|
In other software I have seen calling it "packages" Cheer.s On 02/08/2006, at 14:40, D=F6ring, Markus wrote: > So lets include a new directory called "installer" in the project. > If we dont like the name we can change it later, but I cant think =20 > of any better right now. > I will add some of the libs already. But remember to only use the =20 > source installers, never the comiled stuff. > > -- Markus > > >> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: pyw...@li... >> [mailto:pyw...@li...] Im >> Auftrag von D=F6ring, Markus >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 14:31 >> An: PyWrapper Developers mailing list; Javier privat >> Betreff: Re: [PyWrapper-devel] Libraries distribution in PyWrapper >> >> mx.DateTime alone is also open source. >> http://www.egenix.com/files/python/mxDateTime.html#Copyright >> >> their own kind of license, but I cant see any problem distributing =20= >> it: >> http://www.egenix.com/files/python/mxLicense.html#Public >> >> >> -- Markus >> >> >>> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: pyw...@li... >>> [mailto:pyw...@li...] Im >> Auftrag von >>> Javier privat >>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. August 2006 12:24 >>> An: PyWrapper Developers mailing list >>> Betreff: [PyWrapper-devel] Libraries distribution in PyWrapper >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I was wondering if we could change a bit our strategy for deploying >>> PyWrapper. Right now to install it you have to install: >>> >>> 1)PyXML >>> 2)mxDateTime >>> 3)CherryPy >>> 4)elementtree >>> 5)kid >>> >>> Then you probably will also need: >>> >>> 6) libxml2 >>> 7) a database module >>> >>> and finally if you want BioMOBY support now I will also be >> requiring: >>> >>> 8) fpconst >>> 9) SOAPpy >>> 10) BioMOBY Python >>> >>> This is getting a little bit horrible to install. I think most of >>> these libraries, I think actually all, can be legally redistributed >>> with other software so I was wondering if we could not embed >>> everything into PyWrapper. >>> >>> Well, I know there are some problems. Some of these >> libraries need to >>> be compiled in unix and therefore installation is needed. But in >>> Windows we might be able to distribute them already >> compiled. In the >>> case of unix we can at least include them in the package >> and provide >>> an installer that install all of them into our external_lib >> directory. >>> >>> We can have something like /lib/external_lib folder where >> we include >>> all this stuff. Do you know what happens if we install a certain >>> version of a library there and the user has already the >> same library >>> installed on his python? Which one will take preference? >>> >>> And there is still the open issue of which library to use >> for xslt... >>> we are not happy with none of them and they are all difficult to >>> install in mac os x. Any ideas? >>> >>> Cheers. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> ----------- >>> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join >>> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share >>> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and >>> earn cash >>> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge >> &CID=3DDEVDEV >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PyWrapper-devel mailing list >>> PyW...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pywrapper-devel >>> >> >> -------------------------------------------------------------- >> ----------- >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join >> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to >> share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief >> surveys -- and earn cash >> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge > &CID=3DDEVDEV >> _______________________________________________ >> PyWrapper-devel mailing list >> PyW...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pywrapper-devel >> |