Re: [PyWrapper-devel] [tdwg-tapir] RE: WG: tapir: capabilities
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
jatorre
From: Javier de la T. <ja...@gm...> - 2006-07-31 13:18:31
|
Cool, Then we dont have to discuss anything. Lets make it optional. Cheers. On 7/31/06, "D=F6ring, Markus" <m.d...@bg...> wrote: > good. > PyWrapper caches the metadata in a file and the provider can specify how = often it should be updated. Usually once a day. Then its lightning fast exc= ept for the 1 query. But an empty metadata element is ok. The schema curren= tly doesnt allow this I think. Should we make at least the dct:modified opt= ional? Ah, the ABCDdiscussion again... > > -- Markus > > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: pyw...@li... > > [mailto:pyw...@li...] Im > > Auftrag von Renato De Giovanni > > Gesendet: Montag, 31. Juli 2006 14:28 > > An: tdw...@li... > > Cc: PyWrapper Developers mailing list > > Betreff: Re: [PyWrapper-devel] [tdwg-tapir] RE: WG: tapir: > > capabilities > > > > OK, Markus. Agreed. > > But maybe we could also consider an empty metadata response, > > because "dct:modified" will likely require interaction with > > the DB. And it could take some time for the larger ones > > (experience from DiGIR). > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Renato > > > > > I have implemented the log-only request now and would like > > to suggest > > > the > > > following: > > > > > > 1) add "log-only" attribute to responeOperationGroup. Ive chosen > > > "log-only" cause we already have there an attribute "apply-xslt" > > > 2) add a mandatory boolean attribute "logRequestsDenied" to the > > > operation element in a capabilities request > > > 3) use existing responses for the log-only request. So if you do a > > > search with log-only active, you will get an empty search response > > > back. Thats much easier to implement and doesnt require any > > change in > > > the schema. The same works with inventories. Pong, Capa & Meta > > > responses dont cost much anyway, so we could do a normal > > response (if > > > anyway uses log-only with those requests at all) > > > > > > > > > Does everyone agree to this? > > > The schema is already updated for this. > > > > > > > > > Markus > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > ----------- > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join > > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to > > share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief > > surveys -- and earn cash > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge > &CID=3DDEVDEV > > _______________________________________________ > > PyWrapper-devel mailing list > > PyW...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pywrapper-devel > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share y= our > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > PyWrapper-devel mailing list > PyW...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pywrapper-devel > |