Re: [PyWrapper-devel] tapir get requests & views

[<m.d...@BG...>]

Yes, I think I like it like that.=20

So the last one to be sure. An envelopeless counting search will ignore =
the count or turn on the envelope?

coffee and Ill be back...

-- Markus
 =20

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: pyw...@li...=20
> [mailto:pyw...@li...] Im=20
> Auftrag von Renato De Giovanni
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 25. Juli 2006 13:42
> An: PyWrapper Developers mailing list
> Betreff: Re: [PyWrapper-devel] tapir get requests & views
>=20
> Hi Markus,
>=20
> Sorry, you're right about this. I'm talking with Javier now,=20
> and our suggestion is:
>=20
> * envelopeless responses only allowed for search operations.
> * the content will be what goes inside <search>, so it will=20
> exclude <summary>. I think we can assume that the client=20
> knows what he/she is doing.
> If paging is necessary (which is a TAPIR feature) then=20
> envelope needs to turned on.
>=20
> Is that OK?
>=20
> Regards,
> --
> Renato
>=20
> > Hello,
> > turning off the envelope meant for me only to return the=20
> pure content=20
> > - for example an ABCD record. It was mainly inspired to=20
> have a "view"=20
> > on a single ID to get only the XML describing the object. Or to get=20
> > pure RSS or KML for several objects.
> >
> > If its only to turn off the header and diagnostics I think=20
> we wouldnt=20
> > need it, a client would have to deal with TAPIR anyway.
> >
> >
> > -- Markus
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join=20
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to=20
> share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief=20
> surveys -- and earn cash=20
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge
&CID=3DDEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> PyWrapper-devel mailing list
> PyW...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pywrapper-devel
>=20