Re: [PyWrapper-devel] tapir get requests & views

[<m.d...@BG...>]

So you are suggesting that the formerly global parameter "envelope" is =
only allowed in searches or views based on search templates but not on =
inventories? Thats a change too:

http://ww3.bgbm.org/protocolwiki/GetInvokedOperations

We really need to update this page to have a definite reference. Views =
are missing entirely.

I was collecting some changes on the wiki so charles doesnt forget to =
include them in the specs. its really not finished and already outdated, =
but we need it documented somewhere. Please feel free to edit it =
continously!

http://ww3.bgbm.org/protocolwiki/ImplementationAndDocumentationChanges



-- Markus
 =20

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: pyw...@li...=20
> [mailto:pyw...@li...] Im=20
> Auftrag von Javier de la Torre
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2006 10:30
> An: Markus D=F6ring
> Cc: Renato de Giovanni;=20
> pyw...@li...; D=F6ring, Markus
> Betreff: Re: [PyWrapper-devel] tapir get requests & views
>=20
> Hi Markus,
>=20
> I leave some questions open.
>=20
> > - is the envelope turned off or on when non view requests=20
> are called=20
> > via GET? I thought its turned off then. Am I right?
>=20
> Uff... I would expect it to be turn on, this is the TAPIR=20
> protocol and therefore we should use our envelope unless the=20
> user says no.
>=20
> > - inventories without envelope need some embracing root=20
> element above=20
> > the <record> elements. So should we answer with <tapir:inventory> ?
> This is because we didnt think on inventories without=20
> envelope. If we have to invent an embracing element then I=20
> prefer to have the proper envelope.
> Inventories are a very TAPIR thing. I have the impression=20
> that what you actually want is to have inventories as an=20
> specific search with a select distinct operator. What is=20
> actually fine for me, but I would not make such change now.
>=20
> > - If so, shouldnt we do the same for the other operations (with=20
> > exception of views maybe - well, actually an inventory view has the=20
> > same problem!). If we would do so, the summary element for=20
> paging is=20
> > there as well and we would not need to turn on the entire=20
> envelope for=20
> > counts.
>=20
> Does it matter to have a half envelope or a full envelope? I=20
> think I rather stay with an envelope.
>=20
> > - if not, what about ping?
> pong.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join=20
> SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to=20
> share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief=20
> surveys -- and earn cash=20
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge
&CID=3DDEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> PyWrapper-devel mailing list
> PyW...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pywrapper-devel
>=20