Re: [PyWrapper-devel] tapir get requests & views
Status: Alpha
Brought to you by:
jatorre
From: Javier de la T. <ja...@mn...> - 2006-07-19 08:30:22
|
Hi Markus, I leave some questions open. > - is the envelope turned off or on when non view requests are > called via GET? I thought its turned off then. Am I right? Uff... I would expect it to be turn on, this is the TAPIR protocol and therefore we should use our envelope unless the user says no. > - inventories without envelope need some embracing root element > above the <record> elements. So should we answer with > <tapir:inventory> ? This is because we didnt think on inventories without envelope. If we have to invent an embracing element then I prefer to have the proper envelope. Inventories are a very TAPIR thing. I have the impression that what you actually want is to have inventories as an specific search with a select distinct operator. What is actually fine for me, but I would not make such change now. > - If so, shouldnt we do the same for the other operations (with > exception of views maybe - well, actually an inventory view has the > same problem!). If we would do so, the summary element for paging > is there as well and we would not need to turn on the entire > envelope for counts. Does it matter to have a half envelope or a full envelope? I think I rather stay with an envelope. > - if not, what about ping? pong. |