From: Stanley A. K. <sk...@cp...> - 2011-11-29 12:49:25
|
Also, it probably makes sense if you have at most a few individual services involved. It would be difficult to use for implementing a standard that defines over 40 individual services in WSDL. Stan Klein On Tue, November 29, 2011 5:59 am, Dieter Maurer wrote: > Stanley A. Klein wrote at 2011-11-28 11:56 -0500: >>As I understand it, Suds has limited functionality. It does not support, >>as does ZSI, starting with the WSDL and producing both the client and the >>server. > > "suds" is client only. > > It is a good client, far easier to use > then the ZSI client functionality. > > > > -- > Dieter > -- |