RE: [Pyunit-interest] comments on PyUnit

[Gareth R. <gd...@ra...>]

At 10:54 -0500 2001-07-03, Patrick K. O'Brien wrote:
>Okay, here is a proposal. And I know I am coming up with this rather late in
>the game, for which I apologize.
>
>The magic word is "test." And the new method names are:

"Test" is a poor name in this context, because the name "test" 
doesn't indicate clearly whether the thing to be tested is expected 
to succeed or fail, nor what action is to be taken once the test is 
completed.