Re: [Pyunit-interest] comments on PyUnit

[Fred L. D. Jr. <fd...@ac...>]

Steve Purcell writes:
 > I have now checked the changes into both the Python and PyUnit CVS trees.

  I notice that it still isn't calling TestCase.fail() in all the
fail<Something>() methods -- were we still agreed on that?  I can make
that change is needed.

 > The complete set of fail*() methods, together with their 'assert*' synonyms,
 > is now:
 > 
 >    fail()
 >    failIf()

  Since Guido's suggested we document both naming famillies, we should
have a second name for this -- I suggest "assertNot()".


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at acm.org>
PythonLabs at Digital Creations