Re: [Pyunit-interest] comments on PyUnit

[Steve P. <ste...@ya...>]

Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > One possibility is verify.  Another is check, although that word
> > already has a meaning for unit testing.
> 
> Then all methods should get new names, right?  It's a shame we can't
> use check (or can we?), otherwise that would be my preference.  What
> does JUnit use?

JUnit uses assert and assertEquals, which is a vote in favour or those names.

Why don't we just bite the bullet and document the synonyms? Obviously
tastes differ significantly in this area.

-Steve

-- 
Steve Purcell, Pythangelist
Get testing at http://pyunit.sourceforge.net/
Any opinions expressed herein are my own and not necessarily those of Yahoo