pythoncard-users

[Pythoncard-users] Volunteer proof-reader(s) wanted.

[Alex T. <al...@tw...>]

I've made a non-trivial update to the documentation for the resource 
Editor. (Note - this is the real resourceEditor, not the experimental 
multi-component one).  Much of it is still the same - but there were 
quite a few revisions, and over 50% of the screenshots have been redone.

If you can spare a few minutes, please read over

http://www.tweedly.net/Python/docs/resource_editor_overview.html

and let me know of any problems or changes needed; once I have some 
feedback and some more confidence in it, I'll put these changes into CVS.

btw - a similar doc for the multi-component resourceEditor is coming soon.

-- 
Alex Tweedly       http://www.tweedly.net



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.2/65 - Release Date: 07/08/2005

Re: [Pythoncard-users] Volunteer proof-reader(s) wanted.

[Phil E. <ph...@li...>]

Good work, Alex, certainly no problems that I can see and undoubtedly a
document that will become an invaluable reference work in the future.

On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 22:02 +0100, Alex Tweedly wrote:
> I've made a non-trivial update to the documentation for the resource 
> Editor. (Note - this is the real resourceEditor, not the experimental 
> multi-component one).  Much of it is still the same - but there were 
> quite a few revisions, and over 50% of the screenshots have been redone.
> 
> If you can spare a few minutes, please read over
> 
> http://www.tweedly.net/Python/docs/resource_editor_overview.html
> 
> and let me know of any problems or changes needed; once I have some 
> feedback and some more confidence in it, I'll put these changes into CVS.
> 
> btw - a similar doc for the multi-component resourceEditor is coming soon.
> 
> -- 
> Alex Tweedly       http://www.tweedly.net
> 
> 
> 

Re: [Pythoncard-users] Volunteer proof-reader(s) wanted.

[Kevin A. <al...@se...>]

On Aug 10, 2005, at 1:26 AM, Phil Edwards wrote:

> Good work, Alex, certainly no problems that I can see and undoubtedly a
> document that will become an invaluable reference work in the future.

A big thanks to Alex for updating this document. The original by Dan 
Shafer is at:

http://pythoncard.sourceforge.net/resource_editor_overview.html

Along with many others that Dan and others have done in the past on the 
documentation page of the main site. Kudos to everyone that has 
contributed over the years.

http://pythoncard.sourceforge.net/documentation.html

ka

> On Tue, 2005-08-09 at 22:02 +0100, Alex Tweedly wrote:
>> I've made a non-trivial update to the documentation for the resource
>> Editor. (Note - this is the real resourceEditor, not the experimental
>> multi-component one).  Much of it is still the same - but there were
>> quite a few revisions, and over 50% of the screenshots have been 
>> redone.
>>
>> If you can spare a few minutes, please read over
>>
>> http://www.tweedly.net/Python/docs/resource_editor_overview.html
>>
>> and let me know of any problems or changes needed; once I have some
>> feedback and some more confidence in it, I'll put these changes into 
>> CVS.
>>
>> btw - a similar doc for the multi-component resourceEditor is coming 
>> soon.
>>
>> -- 
>> Alex Tweedly       http://www.tweedly.net

Re: [Pythoncard-users] Volunteer proof-reader(s) wanted.

[Alex T. <al...@tw...>]

Kevin Altis wrote:

>
> On Aug 10, 2005, at 1:26 AM, Phil Edwards wrote:
>
>> Good work, Alex, certainly no problems that I can see and undoubtedly a
>> document that will become an invaluable reference work in the future.
>
>
> A big thanks to Alex for updating this document. The original by Dan 
> Shafer is at:
>
> http://pythoncard.sourceforge.net/resource_editor_overview.html
>
> Along with many others that Dan and others have done in the past on 
> the documentation page of the main site. Kudos to everyone that has 
> contributed over the years.

My apologies to anyone who was confused or misled - not my intention at 
all. This is Dan's document, with about 10% changed to bring it up to 
date to 0.8.1 (and about 50% of the screenshots updated). The kudos for 
the document all go to Dan; if my wording led anyone to think I had 
written this, then I owe some apologies to Dan too. All I did was a few 
tweaks to bring it up to date - enough to want a proof-read, but I hope 
not enough to materially change the excellent quality of Dan's writing.

I kind of just assumed that as this was part of the main documentation, 
it would be familiar to everyone already, so I wasn't as clear about 
this as I should have been.

-- 
Alex Tweedly       http://www.tweedly.net



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.10.2/65 - Release Date: 07/08/2005

Re: [Pythoncard-users] Volunteer proof-reader(s) wanted.

[Phil E. <ph...@li...>]

On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 17:19 +0100, Alex Tweedly wrote:

> My apologies to anyone who was confused or misled - not my intention at 
> all. This is Dan's document, with about 10% changed to bring it up to 
> date to 0.8.1 (and about 50% of the screenshots updated). The kudos for 
> the document all go to Dan; if my wording led anyone to think I had 
> written this, then I owe some apologies to Dan too. All I did was a few 
> tweaks to bring it up to date - enough to want a proof-read, but I hope 
> not enough to materially change the excellent quality of Dan's writing.
> 
> I kind of just assumed that as this was part of the main documentation, 
> it would be familiar to everyone already, so I wasn't as clear about 
> this as I should have been.
> 

I'm astounded - I didn't even know that this existed up until today. I'm
not sure whether to view that as a damning indictment of my own laziness
in finding documentation, or as a huge endorsement of PythonCard for
being so easy to use. ;-)