From: Kevin W. <sw...@wo...> - 2005-06-02 15:02:36
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm very interested in wxPython as a development language, because it's free/open-source and also because of the number of different tools it supports--including PythonCard. I've been lurking on the PythonCard list for some time. I'm also working on learning wxPython itself, mainly by following the various tutorials at the wxPython wiki and also tinkering with the code samples that come with the wxPython distribution. That experience, while hardly making me an expert, has made me a little puzzled about who the intended audience for PythonCard is. Is PythonCard aimed at people who want a RAD environment for wxPython, or for peole who perhaps want to dabble a bit with development but not try to learn wxPython whole hog? I'm asking not to be contrarian, but out of genuine curiosity. While wxPython itself is big and my progress with it has been fairly slow, I don't feel that wxPython is terribly difficult in itself. As well, PythonCard only supports a subset of wxPython widgets and does not provide a true drag-and-drop development environment. So, does PythonCard provide the expected gain in ease-of-use and development speed that comes with giving up the power (and complexity) of the full wxPython environment? Disclosure about my own background: I've done "get-my-hands-dirty" development work, coding a few non-trivial applications in Tcl/Tk completely by hand, and I've also done some "quick-and-dirty" drag-and-drop development with Apple's Xcode tools (AppleScript Studio--slick and free, but not open-source). So, I've seen both ends of the spectrum, and am trying to understand where PythonCard fits in. I appreciate the perspective that others can provide, especially about the good points of PythonCard that I am perhaps overlooking. - -- Cheers, Kevin Walzer, PhD WordTech Software--Open Source Applications and Packages for OS X http://www.wordtech-software.com http://www.kevin-walzer.com mailto:sw...@wo... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCnx+HJmdQs+6YVcoRAp3MAKCCErlV3bq6kmgNDnYDK7rZRRRIfwCeKuhU 44dQeJSJebLrdfvLwxSnoiQ= =bO5m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Alex T. <al...@tw...> - 2005-06-02 18:34:25
|
Kevin Walzer wrote: > I'm very interested in wxPython as a development language, because it's > free/open-source and also because of the number of different tools it > supports--including PythonCard. I've been lurking on the PythonCard list > for some time. I'm also working on learning wxPython itself, mainly by > following the various tutorials at the wxPython wiki and also tinkering > with the code samples that come with the wxPython distribution. > > That experience, while hardly making me an expert, has made me a little > puzzled about who the intended audience for PythonCard is. Is PythonCard > aimed at people who want a RAD environment for wxPython, yes > or for peole who perhaps want to dabble a bit with development but not > try to learn > wxPython whole hog? yes > I'm asking not to be contrarian, but out of genuine curiosity. While > wxPython itself is big and my progress with it has been fairly slow, I > don't feel that wxPython is terribly difficult in itself. As well, > PythonCard only supports a subset of wxPython widgets and does not > provide a true drag-and-drop development environment. what's your minimum definition to be a "true drag-and-drop" environment ? If you mean a full "integrated live environment" (e.g Hypercard, Metacard, RunRev, etc.) then it's not, and never will be, that. But then - neither will any other Python based approach, and very few others either. If you "simply" want an environment where you can layout and characterize the graphic elements, with reasonable integration with the associated code, then I think PythonCard is fairly close. If you haven't tried it, try the experimental resourceEditor (see earlier on the list, or it will be in CVS soon - it adds a number of features that I think are useful. Only supporting a subset of wxPython widgets is, I believe, a deliberate and important strategy. There are so many of them that it's easy to be overwhelmed by the choice, or to spend too much time learning them all (and then forgetting about them before you ever need them). I believe that PythonCard *should* support the 30% of wxPython widgets needed to handle 90% of straightforward applications. > So, does PythonCard provide the expected gain in ease-of-use and > development > speed that comes with giving up the power (and complexity) of the full > wxPython environment? Yes. Of course, you don't give up the power of wxPython. It is possible, and in most cases practical, to use directly those wxPython widgets that you need and which PCard doesn't support. Of course, it means that you need to go through some of the learning curve - but you don't need all of it, and often you can avoid the tedium (my opinion) of programming in wxPython for a large percentage of your application. > Disclosure about my own background: I've done "get-my-hands-dirty" > development work, coding a few non-trivial applications in Tcl/Tk > completely by hand, and I've also done some "quick-and-dirty" > drag-and-drop development with Apple's Xcode tools (AppleScript > Studio--slick and free, but not open-source). So, I've seen both ends of > the spectrum, and am trying to understand where PythonCard fits in. > > I appreciate the perspective that others can provide, especially about > the good points of PythonCard that I am perhaps overlooking. I've written a number of small applications in Pythoncard - mostly for personal use, some used by myself and a few other people. In every case but one, I was able to do what I needed in Pythoncard, and they covered a fair range of things - file manipulation / synching - games - email analysis - web scraping and presentation - photo management - FIM that's a Family Information Manager - like a PIM, but the focus is on shared data, so it does peer-to-peer cross-network synching for a shared calendar and address book. - toys (e.g. the "flock" Pythoncard sample I think of as a toy - not quite a game, but no practical use :-) In some cases, the finished application might have been nicer or more powerful without some constraint from Pythoncard - but then, they could all be improved in many different ways. (I should say that I have used sizers in a number of them, which strictly speaking is "beyond Pythoncard". But even then I find it so much easier to think about and develop in a visual layout environment, and then when I'm 90% done, add the sizer code. In some cases, I've done that 90% and then decided it was easier and better to write geometry management code specific for the project than to force-fit it into sizers). So, for me, the gain in ease-of-use and development speed has been substantial and significant, and I don't think I'm giving up much, if anything, by designing projects with PythonCard in mind - knowing I can "reach through" to wxPython direct for the small percentage of the code that needs to do so, in a small percentage of projects. If you're developing substantial commercial apps, your mileage will vary - and you're probably outside the target audience of Pythoncard. -- Alex Tweedly http://www.tweedly.net -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.1 - Release Date: 02/06/2005 |
From: Bo G. <bo...@sy...> - 2005-06-02 19:00:03
|
If you want to see the difference for yourself, try using Boa for a while to start building a wxPython app, then switch and use Pythoncard to build the same app. That's what I did, and I was so relieved I nearly relieved myself, if you get my drift. Coding in Pythoncard has been a big time-saver for me. I'm currently co-building a fairly complex application with a database backend, and I think if we had to use wxPython for the whole thing we would have chosen a different route. Bo Kevin Walzer wrote: > I'm very interested in wxPython as a development language, because it's > free/open-source and also because of the number of different tools it > supports--including PythonCard. I've been lurking on the PythonCard list > for some time. I'm also working on learning wxPython itself, mainly by > following the various tutorials at the wxPython wiki and also tinkering > with the code samples that come with the wxPython distribution. > > That experience, while hardly making me an expert, has made me a little > puzzled about who the intended audience for PythonCard is. Is PythonCard > aimed at people who want a RAD environment for wxPython, or for peole > who perhaps want to dabble a bit with development but not try to learn > wxPython whole hog? > > I'm asking not to be contrarian, but out of genuine curiosity. While > wxPython itself is big and my progress with it has been fairly slow, I > don't feel that wxPython is terribly difficult in itself. As well, > PythonCard only supports a subset of wxPython widgets and does not > provide a true drag-and-drop development environment. So, does > PythonCard provide the expected gain in ease-of-use and development > speed that comes with giving up the power (and complexity) of the full > wxPython environment? Disclosure about my own background: I've done "get-my-hands-dirty" > development work, coding a few non-trivial applications in Tcl/Tk > completely by hand, and I've also done some "quick-and-dirty" > drag-and-drop development with Apple's Xcode tools (AppleScript > Studio--slick and free, but not open-source). So, I've seen both ends of > the spectrum, and am trying to understand where PythonCard fits in. > > I appreciate the perspective that others can provide, especially about > the good points of PythonCard that I am perhaps overlooking. > > > -- > Cheers, > > Kevin Walzer, PhD > WordTech Software--Open Source Applications and Packages for OS X > http://www.wordtech-software.com > http://www.kevin-walzer.com > mailto:sw...@wo... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Yahoo. Introducing Yahoo! Search Developer Network - Create apps using Yahoo! Search APIs Find out how you can build Yahoo! directly into your own Applications - visit http://developer.yahoo.net/?fr=offad-ysdn-ostg-q22005 _______________________________________________ Pythoncard-users mailing list Pyt...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pythoncard-users |
From: Alex T. <al...@tw...> - 2005-06-02 23:23:15
|
Kevin Walzer wrote: > That experience, while hardly making me an expert, has made me a little > puzzled about who the intended audience for PythonCard is. Is PythonCard > aimed at people who want a RAD environment for wxPython, or for peole > who perhaps want to dabble a bit with development but not try to learn > wxPython whole hog? > > I'm asking not to be contrarian, but out of genuine curiosity. It's a good question - so it deserves two answers. I sent the "serious" one earlier ..... Now the 'smartass' answer : the target audience for PythonCard is *ME* OK, I'm optimistic enough to assume that if it helps me, it'll also help other people :-) And naive enough to assume that if Kevin thinks the target audience is *him* - then what I want is close enough. -- Alex Tweedly http://www.tweedly.net -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.322 / Virus Database: 267.4.1 - Release Date: 02/06/2005 |