Alex Tweedly wrote:
> Brian Mahoney wrote:
>
>> Not an official developer, but sometimes early adopter, I didn't realize
>> you wanted responses to make things official. The SourceForge CVS
>> has been cranky at times, while Subversion for other sites has been
>> much better for me.
>> I'll let you know if this CVS change makes life easier.
>>
> Yes, I'm inclined to think svn couldn't be much worse - but I've only
> used it on other projects in "read-only" mode, so don't have a
> well-qualified opinion.
>
>> On 5/12/06, Andy Todd <an...@ha...> wrote:
>>
>>> Please note this change in the SourceForge CVS service, happening this
>>> weekend. The biggest impact is that you'll need to use
>>> 'pythoncard.cvs.sourceforge.net' where you would previously use
>>> 'cvs.sourceforge.net'.
>>>
>>> Whilst we're talking about version control, there hasn't been any
>>> response to my proposal to move to Subversion so I'm officially
>>> retracting it.
>>>
> I've seen responses from Kevin and, I thought, one other - and I think I
> replied with a half-hearted agreement myself.
>
> OTOH I haven't seen this original mail from Andy (that Brian replied
> to). And I saw a message from Dan that was a follow-up to another
> message which I hadn't seen - so I'm wondering just how reliable SF's
> mail lists are.
>
> I'd check in the archive - but it appears to be down at the moment (or
> at least, it denies there is a pythoncard-devel list :-)
>
>
The sourceForge archive isn't up to much. I find it better to use the
one at gmane.org - http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.pythoncard.devel
Where you can see the original post about Subversion;
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.pythoncard.devel/141
Regards,
Andy
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From the desk of Andrew J Todd esq - http://www.halfcooked.com/
|
