From: Ruben M. <rmc...@ya...> - 2004-05-20 19:41:15
|
> We're still relying on some of the design decisions > and simplifications > we made in PythonCard several years ago and that is > limiting some of > the things we might do. One of the big reasons to > finish off 1.0 > without radically changing the basic PythonCard > design is so that work > can be started on 2.0, which might end up much more > in sync with other > wxWidget tools like XRC resource editor. One of the > big questions is > still who is the target audience for PythonCard 1.0 > or 2.0? If someone > is comfortable with wxPython then PythonCard 1.0 > probably doesn't make > much sense for them. Yes, I can see that 1.0 should be a finished implementation of the initial concepts. It is a great tool for what it does. It has weaned me off of wxPython, maybe a bit too much at this point in time since I now have to get my mind around it again. However, I definetly think that the 2.x goal should be a more ambitious one (something like full support for wxPython widgets for example ;). So, maybe it is still to early to talk about this. 1.0 seems to be very close, and very worth while. But, thanks for your in depth response. -Ruben __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Domains Claim yours for only $14.70/year http://smallbusiness.promotions.yahoo.com/offer |