From: David L. <wh...@oz...> - 2002-01-08 03:59:33
|
This would be... (wait for it...) Three Card Monty? ;) I recall a skit on Lupins though ... <g> Dave LeBlanc > -----Original Message----- > From: pyt...@li... > [mailto:pyt...@li...]On Behalf Of Dan > Shafer > Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 18:55 > To: pyt...@li... > Subject: [Pythoncard-users] Re: What Do We Call These Things? > > > Good, lively discussion. > > I'm inclined to agree with the other old 'Card fart here (back at ya, > Danny!) when he says that HyperCard probably carries around a tad too > much baggage to be useful in this situation. And Kevin's point that > an app built on top of PythonCard (or whatever we end up deciding to > call it) that provides the lightweight data storage automation that > HyperCard users know and love is probably a better direction anyway. > > I'm fine with calling these things we create applications rather than > stacks. But the other terms for the components leave me cold and > wondering if I'm working in Visual Basic again. (That's OK. It's a > recurring nightmare.) > > So after spending some time noodling about this, here's a concrete > proposal that we can at least start shooting at. > > A Monty application's visible interface consists of one or more > Master Layouts which define sets of components that are common to all > Windows that share a given Master Layout. Windows optionally have > additional components that are not defined in their Master Layout. > One type of component is a Pane, which is a container for other > components. It is legal to nest Panes. The simplest case is a Window > which is identical to its Master Layout in every respect. > > Just a straw person. Let's beat it up! > -- > Dan Shafer, Author-Consultant > http://www.danshafer.com > http://www.shafermedia.com > > _______________________________________________ > Pythoncard-users mailing list > Pyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pythoncard-users > |