RE: [Pythoncard-users] logging revisited

[Patrick K. O'B. <po...@or...>]

Looks good to me, for what it's worth.

---
Patrick K. O'Brien
Orbtech.com - Your Source For Python Development Services
Phone: 314-963-3206


> As a simple test, I added the following code to log.py below the class
> definitions, but before the unit tests.
>
> log = Log().getInstance()
> def info(*args): log.info(*args)
>
> Then in the worldclock.py sample, I added
> import log
> and commented out the other Log code to make sure there was no
> interference.
> The worldclock code changed from
>
>   self.log.info("updating image ", url)
> to
>   log.info("updating image ", url)
>
> This seems to work just fine. The module defines the single
> instance of the
> Log class and global functions (global to the module) are defined for each
> class method. The rest of the framework and any samples that want to use
> logging don't care about the implementation, the syntax is simple, and no
> capabilities are lost as far as I can tell except subclassing Log.
>
> I'm no Python language expert, so if I'm missing something, please clue me
> in.
>
> ka
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pythoncard-users mailing list
> Pyt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pythoncard-users