From: Kevin A. <al...@se...> - 2001-09-04 04:00:43
|
> From: Ron Johnson > > On Monday 03 September 2001 10:41 pm, Steven D. Arnold wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Has any thought been given to a possible object component model? It > [snip] > > Picking either of these would provide the added advantage of > > compatibility with other software using that model.... > > > > Comments? > > But it would reduce (nay, eliminate) portability. > > -- > Mon Sep 3 22:43:49 2001 > Seq. Timestamp Uptime > ---- ------------------------ ------------ > 1: Mon Jul 16 16:28:17 2001 - 43 07:21:59 - 2.4.6-3mdk > 2: Thu May 17 01:44:04 2001 - 35 15:31:51 - 2.4.3-20mdk > 3: Thu Jun 21 17:33:18 2001 - 10 05:29:02 - 2.4.3-20mdk > 4: Sun Jul 1 23:03:05 2001 - 7 10:13:18 - 2.4.3-20mdk > 5: Wed Jul 11 15:11:11 2001 - 5 01:16:26 - 2.4.6-3mdk > 12: Mon Sep 3 21:34:47 2001 - 0 01:09:02 - 2.4.9 <<-- I give up, what does this mean? ka |