From: Andy T. <an...@ha...> - 2006-05-12 22:03:48
|
Alex Tweedly wrote: > Brian Mahoney wrote: > >> Not an official developer, but sometimes early adopter, I didn't realize >> you wanted responses to make things official. The SourceForge CVS >> has been cranky at times, while Subversion for other sites has been >> much better for me. >> I'll let you know if this CVS change makes life easier. >> > Yes, I'm inclined to think svn couldn't be much worse - but I've only > used it on other projects in "read-only" mode, so don't have a > well-qualified opinion. > >> On 5/12/06, Andy Todd <an...@ha...> wrote: >> >>> Please note this change in the SourceForge CVS service, happening this >>> weekend. The biggest impact is that you'll need to use >>> 'pythoncard.cvs.sourceforge.net' where you would previously use >>> 'cvs.sourceforge.net'. >>> >>> Whilst we're talking about version control, there hasn't been any >>> response to my proposal to move to Subversion so I'm officially >>> retracting it. >>> > I've seen responses from Kevin and, I thought, one other - and I think I > replied with a half-hearted agreement myself. > > OTOH I haven't seen this original mail from Andy (that Brian replied > to). And I saw a message from Dan that was a follow-up to another > message which I hadn't seen - so I'm wondering just how reliable SF's > mail lists are. > > I'd check in the archive - but it appears to be down at the moment (or > at least, it denies there is a pythoncard-devel list :-) > > The sourceForge archive isn't up to much. I find it better to use the one at gmane.org - http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.pythoncard.devel Where you can see the original post about Subversion; http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.pythoncard.devel/141 Regards, Andy -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From the desk of Andrew J Todd esq - http://www.halfcooked.com/ |