Re: [Pythoncard-devel] [Fwd: SUBJECT: SourceForge.net: CVS service offering changes]

[Alex T. <al...@tw...>]

Brian Mahoney wrote:

> Not an official developer, but sometimes early adopter, I didn't realize
> you wanted responses to make things official.  The SourceForge CVS
> has been cranky at times, while Subversion for other sites has been
> much better for me.
> I'll let you know if this CVS change makes life easier.
>
Yes, I'm inclined to think svn couldn't be much worse - but I've only 
used it on other projects in "read-only" mode, so don't have a 
well-qualified opinion.

> On 5/12/06, Andy Todd <an...@ha...> wrote:
>
>> Please note this change in the SourceForge CVS service, happening this
>> weekend. The biggest impact is that you'll need to use
>> 'pythoncard.cvs.sourceforge.net' where you would previously use
>> 'cvs.sourceforge.net'.
>>
>> Whilst we're talking about version control, there hasn't been any
>> response to my proposal to move to Subversion so I'm officially
>> retracting it.
>>
I've seen responses from Kevin and, I thought, one other - and I think I 
replied with a half-hearted agreement myself.

OTOH I haven't seen this original mail from Andy (that Brian replied 
to). And I saw a message from Dan that was a follow-up to another 
message which I hadn't seen - so I'm wondering just how reliable SF's 
mail lists are.

I'd check in the archive - but it appears to be down at the moment (or 
at least, it denies there is a pythoncard-devel list :-)


-- 
Alex Tweedly       http://www.tweedly.net



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/337 - Release Date: 11/05/2006