From: Waylan L. <wa...@gm...> - 2007-10-30 04:03:50
|
This is just an FYI that I have made some administrative changes to the tracker on Sourceforge for Python-Markdown [1]. If you've previously submitted a report and can't find it now, this may be of interest to you. Previously, the tracker included 4 sections (Bugs, Feature Requests, Patches, and Support Requests). Given the small size of the project and the low number of items in the tracker, having so many sections doesn't make sense. Actually, I kept forgetting sections other than "bugs" existed and tend to ignore them. Therefore, all open non-bug items (all 2 of them) have been moved to the "Bugs" section and all other sections have been hidden (Sourceforge won't allow deleting). I'd rename the "Bugs" section to something more generic but that's not possible either. I've considered hiding the "Bugs" section as well and creating a new, generically named section, but then only admins (Yuri and myself) could view the old closed tickets. As there's no 'mass move to another section' feature, I'm not manually moving all those old tickets (currently 36 plus 5 open). Perhaps I'll make this change after the next release. Oh, and I also added a setting so that I am notified via email for anything submitted to the tracker. Previously, I'd have to go check the site manually which I may or may not remember regularly. Unfortunately, I don't see a way to have more than one email address notified so I couldn't add Yuri also. I'll try to keep him updated of anything of interest. The limitations of this site are rather annoying. It doesn't help that it's painfully slow. [1]: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=153041 -- ---- Waylan Limberg wa...@gm... |
From: Yuri T. <yu...@cs...> - 2007-10-30 04:11:51
|
> The limitations of this site are rather annoying. It doesn't help that > it's painfully slow. Should we move? I am not exactly a big fan of sourceforge myself and would have moved earlier, if I had the opportunity to research the alternatives. - yuri > > [1]: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=153041 > > -- > ---- > Waylan Limberg > wa...@gm... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Python-markdown-discuss mailing list > Pyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-markdown-discuss > -- Yuri Takhteyev Ph.D. Candidate, UC Berkeley School of Information http://takhteyev.org/, http://www.freewisdom.org/ |
From: Waylan L. <wa...@gm...> - 2007-10-30 04:25:09
|
On 10/30/07, Yuri Takhteyev <yu...@cs...> wrote: > > The limitations of this site are rather annoying. It doesn't help that > > it's painfully slow. > > Should we move? That would be fine by me. > I am not exactly a big fan of sourceforge myself and > would have moved earlier, if I had the opportunity to research the > alternatives. If I have some time, I'll do some research myself. If anyone else out there has some input, please do speak up. -- ---- Waylan Limberg wa...@gm... |
From: Herbert P. <her...@gm...> - 2007-10-30 08:50:31
|
i've moved away from sourceforge a long time ago (for bug tracking) because it was (and obviously is) extremely slow.. first i've used my own implementation of a bug tracker.. but since i actually wanted to track bugs, and not fix the bugtracker.. i eventually moved to google code hosting .. the issue tracker is very minimalistic but still powerful enough - http://code.google.com/p/sct-project/issues/list (the only thing which is annoying to me is that users who are not part of the project can't add 'Labels' and since everything is done by labels (including the categories feature request, bug report, etc.) i basically have to edit all incoming bug reports to add the correct labels.. but it is very fast and all labels can be customized by the project admin ..) On 10/30/07, Waylan Limberg <wa...@gm...> wrote: > On 10/30/07, Yuri Takhteyev <yu...@cs...> wrote: > > > The limitations of this site are rather annoying. It doesn't help that > > > it's painfully slow. > > > > Should we move? > > That would be fine by me. > > > I am not exactly a big fan of sourceforge myself and > > would have moved earlier, if I had the opportunity to research the > > alternatives. > > If I have some time, I'll do some research myself. If anyone else out > there has some input, please do speak up. > > > > -- > ---- > Waylan Limberg > wa...@gm... > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Python-markdown-discuss mailing list > Pyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-markdown-discuss > |
From: Anand <ana...@gm...> - 2007-10-30 12:17:20
|
On 30-Oct-07, at 9:55 AM, Waylan Limberg wrote: > On 10/30/07, Yuri Takhteyev <yu...@cs...> wrote: >>> The limitations of this site are rather annoying. It doesn't help >>> that >>> it's painfully slow. >> >> Should we move? > > That would be fine by me. > >> I am not exactly a big fan of sourceforge myself and >> would have moved earlier, if I had the opportunity to research the >> alternatives. > > If I have some time, I'll do some research myself. If anyone else out > there has some input, please do speak up. http://launchpad.net is worth exploring. |