From: Anand <ana...@gm...> - 2007-10-12 12:49:37
|
On 08-Oct-07, at 9:33 AM, Yuri Takhteyev wrote: > I found a fix for this particular > problem: > > replace > > + (NOBRACKET + r'(\['+NOBRACKET)*6 > + (NOBRACKET+ r'\])*'+NOBRACKET)*6 > > with: > > + (NOBRACKET + r'(\[')*6 > + (NOBRACKET+ r'\])*')*6 > > in the defintion of "BRK". Which as far as my test suite shows does > not causes any problems (and really shouldn't, since the second > NOBRACKET was redundant in both cases). Thanks Yuri, that solved the problem. |