From: Waylan L. <wa...@gm...> - 2009-10-11 15:10:58
|
Oh, I should state that I am only stating my personal views on setuptools here. I do not know Yuri's position and will use whatever he prefers. This was simply an attempt to explain why I did what I did. On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Waylan Limberg <wa...@gm...> wrote: > First, sorry for not responding directly to this message. As I've > stated elsewhere, my connectivity has been very limited these past few > weeks and probably will be for the next couple months. My normal dev > box for this stuff is currently disassembled and in storage - making > proper testing in all supported versions less than ideal. Like many > open source projects, I do this in my spare time and sometimes life > gets in the way. > > Second, I will add that while setuptools certainly has it's merits, I > personally do not care for it and would prefer to not use it at all. > For more specifics from someone smarter than me, I would suggest > reading Ian Bicking's thoughts (among others) on setuptools (the > creator of pip and virtualenv). Of course, at the same time I realize > that others actually use easy_install regularly (including markdown > users) so I make sure it works. > > However, that's about as far as I prefer to go. I saw your patch > switched to using setuptools and I stopped reading. I could suggest > that if someone provides a patch that allows use of various extended > features of setuptools we would use it, but the fact is, I don't want > to maintain it. > -- ---- \X/ /-\ `/ |_ /-\ |\| Waylan Limberg |