Re: [Python-markdown-discuss] Python-Markdown 2.0 Release Candidate

[Artem Y. <se...@sp...>]

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Waylan Limberg <wa...@gm...> wrote:

> Thanks Artem. Are those numbers averages from multiple runs there? In
> other words, is this something I can use in the release notes?
> Although, all I really need is a percentage of change - probably just
> for the "markdown-syntax" document.


I got this numbers using test-markdown.py, it repeats every test 10 times,
so it's not average, it's sum, but for percentage it will be enough. I did
it few times and numbers were almost the same.
But I can redo it with timeit module to get better accuracy.


>
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Artem Yunusov <se...@sp...> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Yuri Takhteyev <qar...@gm...>
> wrote:
> >> BTW, has anyone done any benchmarks recently comparing the performance
> >> of this new release candidate to 1.7?
> >
> > I did today, here is some of the results:
> >
> > 1.7 version:
> > markdown-syntax:1.240000
> > bracket_re:2.870000
> > ordered-and-unordered-list:0.190000
> >
> > 2.0 release candidate:
> > markdown-syntax:0.880000
> > bracket_re:1.670000
> > ordered-and-unordered-list:0.150000
>
>
>
>
> --
> ----
> \X/ /-\ `/ |_ /-\ |\|
> Waylan Limberg


Regards,
Artem