From: Waylan L. <wa...@gm...> - 2009-02-12 05:21:50
|
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Yuri Takhteyev <qar...@gm...> wrote: >> OK, thanks. Is there any projection on when 2.0 will be released? > > Good question. Do we have any outstanding issues? I had a plan of > changing all the processors from run() to __call__(), but I've given > up on this plan since. So, unless we have any specific bugs, we should > just release it. > I have two things on my list. Unfortunately, I haven't had time to work on anything lately. I have a solution for both (in my head), I just haven't implemented them yet. Once I do, I'll let everyone know. In case your wondering, the two items are: 1. Lists currently only nest one level with the new core - interestingly no tests were checking deeper than that so I didn't catch it right way. This is a *must have* IMO, so we need to wait for this before releasing. If ElementTree Elements had references to their parents this would be *a lot* easier. While I'm at it, I also have one minor change to the API for the blockprocessors in mind - so this needs to happen before we lock into 2.0. 2. The fenced_code_block extension needs some cleanup per discussion on the markdown list. This is a pretty simple adjustment to the regex and should be easy enough. Nice to have, but probably not a show-stopper. There is also some more documentation work to do. The important stuff is documented in the source and up-to-date (we'll copy it to the wiki when we release), but some of the extensions need their documentation updated (such as the new wikilinks ext). Again, not a show stopper. If someone wants to help out, patches are welcome adding docs for each extension to the repo based on what is currently in the wiki. -- ---- \X/ /-\ `/ |_ /-\ |\| Waylan Limberg |