From: John S. <jo...@sz...> - 2008-11-06 10:30:41
|
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:28 AM, John Szakmeister <jo...@sz...> wrote: > I was trying to ensure that a couple of code paths were actually being > reached. While in the process of doing that, I created a couple of > tests that seem like they should work, but currently fail. > > para-with-hr-test.patch adds a really simple test case: > text, text, text > *** > more text > > The output that's produced is completely missing the first line. > > header-test.patch is one that I came up with while trying to make > __processParagraph() hit the other conditional (one where it > specifically looks for the start of a header). Interestingly enough, > I was never able to get something to run down that path. However, I > did find that if I embed a header into a list like so: > 1. My list > > ## blah, blah > > Then I don't get a header element in the list. Whups! There was more in the header-test patch than should have been. Try the attached instead. -John |