|
From: Artem <ne...@gm...> - 2008-07-01 23:07:29
|
Yuri Takhteyev wrote: > Interesting. Not sure what exactly we would gain from it, but it > should be possible. Let's not worry about this for now, though. I > think the next step should be dropping all the current inline patterns > and replacing them with simple regular expression substitutions, > perhaps borrowed from Trent's code. In fact, we should see if > applyInlinePatterns could just use a chunk of Trent's code "as is". > What is the profit of dropping current inline pasterns? We still need some functions, that would create DOM element from regexp match object. Maybe we should just refactor current inline patterns regexps ? Now I'm fixing bugs, and some of them require Inline patterns changes. |