Re: unicode value

[Alain S. <asp...@gm...>]

On 5/24/07, Michael Str=F6der <mi...@st...> wrote:
>
> Alain Spineux wrote:
> >
> > On 5/24/07, *Michael Str=F6der* <mi...@st...
> > <mailto:mi...@st...>> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for showing me my ignorance. I was not knowing about * and + !
> > Easy, only named attributes will be converted!
> > In this case maybe is it possible to use [ '*', u'givenName', u'sn' ]
> > to convert only 'givenName' and 'sn'
>
> But then you will not gain much! Still the application has to know which
> attributes have to be converted. =3D> It's not worth hiding the conversio=
n
> within python-ldap.


I don't spend  too much then I dont't expect too much too :-)
Are you using often '+' and '*'  (in real application, not ldap browser, no=
r
editor tools) ?
And that way, user keep control with explicit conversion.

>
> > class UnicodeLDAPObject(LDAPObject):
>
> Sorry, I consider ldap.ldapobject to be low-level.


:-(

The only clean solution would be something involving LDAP schema processing=
!


Yes but what about unknown field type ?

Ciao, Michael.
>

Your remarks help me, don't hesitate to share your feeling.


--=20
--
Alain Spineux
aspineux gmail com
May the sources be with you