Re: Planning python-ldap release 2.2.0

[Jens V. <je...@da...>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 4 Apr 2006, at 11:50, Michael Str=F6der wrote:

> Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>>> Anyone else on the list should comment now(!) about the new  =20
>>>> requirement
>>>> for OpenLDAP libs 2.2.
>>
>> I have no problem with it.
>>
>> You'll probably end up with more support questions, though, because
>> this requirement shuts out people on RH9/RHEL3/FC3 and earlier =20
>> who  use
>> the distribution-provided OpenLDAP.
>
> Yes, I expect these people to request support for OpenLDAP 2.0.x. But
> people not willing to use a C compiler probably will have to stick to
> older python-ldap releases anyway. ;-)

Yes, absolutely, I just fear those people who have this irrational =20
urge to upgrade just for upgrading's sake if something new is =20
released, and a lot of them don't like answers such as "If you're on =20
OL 2.0.27, please use python-ldap versions <=3D 2.0.10 because the =20
newest versions won't run against your antique OpenLDAP". :P

jens

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEMlCyRAx5nvEhZLIRAlcEAJ9qkLi35DctFo9MZzjwK+zs/ZqI3gCgkm9V
klufummU/drZLg/YKMvm8xY=3D
=3DoajH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----