From: Deepak G. <de...@ar...> - 2005-02-22 20:01:44
|
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 09:57 +0100, Michael Str=F6der wrote: > > My approach has been to model the OpenLDAP LDAPControl struct as a > > tuple: > >=20 > > (OID <string>, Criticality Flag <boolean>, Value <string/list of byte= s>) >=20 > I'd prefer to have a dedicated class hierachy for this in a separate=20 > sub-module ldap.controls. I will provide something for it which is=20 > compatible with your modifications to LDAPObject.c. Great! I held off on implementing a higher-level abstraction since I wanted to get opinions first on the lower level patch. But it's awesome that we're moving forward on this. :) On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 09:43 +0100, Michael Str=F6der wrote:=20 > Jeremy, the author of picses, already planned to negotiate a more=20 > liberal license with CNRI. A similar license issue was solved for Pytho= n=20 > itself before. But AFAIK no progress so far. That's too bad. :( I'll take a look at pysnmp.ber and see how it compares. Cheers! deepak -- Deepak Giridharagopal Applied Research Laboratories University of Texas at Austin |